'Traditional marriage'
To which "traditional marriage" is the Rev. Ron Baity referring ("Same-sex ballot strategy forming," Feb. 4)? Before 1900, when women could not own property? Before 1967, when interracial couples could not marry? Before 1993, when marital rape was legal? Before 1724, when blacks could marry only with their owner's permission? With his Bible in hand, he's probably referring to biblical times, when a man just had sex with a woman to make her his wife, whether she agreed or not.
Baity claims to speak for God, just like the writers of the Bible, obviously interpreting what God wants and hates to fit their own beliefs. Why not follow Jesus, who was quoted in the Bible, to cherish each person as a child of God and love without judgment of what is acceptable and what's not? Identify, hate and correct your own sin before you cast light on someone else.
Perhaps Baity's time would be better spent saving those "traditional marriages" that are falling apart instead of denying others the right to marry their life partners. If his church wants to get involved in politics, maybe it's time to take away its tax-exempt status.
SALLY WALTON
King
Susan B. Komen
I have never supported the Susan B. Komen for the Cure because of its affiliation with Planned Parenthood. However, I was excited when it withdrew its support of Planned Parenthood.
But, sadly, it has succumbed to the pressure of Planned Parenthood and its supporters.
If the Komen foundation would have remained ethical with integrity, it would have held on to its initial decision. That would have been an effective step toward changing the culture of death that exists in this country.
If we do not turn this abomination around, nothing, absolutely nothing, will change in this country. We will continue to have all kinds of crime, immorality and economic downturn.
Over 50 million people have been murdered through abortion alone. Think about all the goods and services that would have been provided to these people if they existed today. Baby furniture and supplies, housing, food, clothes, toys, books, schools and supplies, entertainment, college educations, medical care, dental care, etc. That would have been a lot of money pumped into this economy over the past 39 years. And all that Social Security money that did not get paid.
We cannot continue to slap God in the face by destroying the lives he creates for our benefit and His and expect Him to continue blessing our country. We are paying now for the past 39 years and if we continue I fear for how bad it's really going to get.
RUTH A. COFFEY
Advance
Birth control basics
All women who have practiced birth control or plan to practice it need to be informed. They should be sure the people they vote for reflect their own thoughts on contraception before casting their votes.
It was in 1965 (seriously) that the U.S. Supreme Court (Griswold vs. Conn.) said it was a basic privacy right to have birth-control methods available. Up until then, birth control was illegal in some states. Do we really want to go back to that?
E.T. SHAFER
Seven Devils
Correspondent of the Week
Ban this texting
The one-hour-five-minute-long verbal assault on the 15-year-old student by Coach Mike Muse and Officer James Deeney is reprehensible ("Student recorded coach's tirade," Feb. 2). Their prior reputations don't excuse the vicious threats and language used and should result in some form of punishment. I see no reason for any adult employee of our school system to be personally texting a student at all, much less the heavy volume of texting as suggested in the news. The harsh reality of today is that there have been far too many incidents of inappropriate relationships in our nation's schools. Sadly, some of these incidents have happened right here in our own backyard. Just because there is no policy in place stopping teachers from personally texting students doesn't mean that it is a good idea.
The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County school board should simply ban the practice of texting between students and teachers and only allow communications to be done via email through the school's website. Muse and Deeney have only made themselves look as though they have something to hide by going after this student with so much venom. I would suggest to them that like it or not, they turn their phones over to the proper authorities so they can clear their names and remove all doubt as to what was going on between them and that 16-year-old girl. Consider it a lesson learned and a warning to others in our school system to use better judgment in the new digital world.
CHRIS HOLLAND
Kernersville
Sum It Up
Should school systems allow texting between teachers and students? Respond toletters@wsjournal.com and put "Sum It Up" in the subject header. Only signed entries, please, no anonymous ones. Briefer responses receive preference in print.