The government's responsibility
I hear conservative Christians say that, yes, it's good to feed the poor, but it's not the government's responsibility. Our tax money shouldn't go for that; it's the churches' responsibility (even though they can't meet all the needs and don't really try).
Neither is it the government's responsibility to teach children about religion or lead people in Christian prayer.
But if this is a Christian nation, and schools and governments do have the right to direct sectarian prayer, then I want to see them use their authority to act out the rest of the Christian doctrine. No one can seriously argue that a Christian government should lead prayer but shouldn't feed the poor.
It's got to be one way or the other, Christians; it can't be both.
BUDDY OSBORNE
Winston-Salem
Greece and the U.S.
Like it or not, what's happening in Greece right now (demonstrations, riots, vandalism, looting) will probably happen in the U.S. soon. Why? Because our politicians, Democrats, Republicans and independents, don't have the guts to present a plan to the American people that will address our soaring debt and implement drastic, but necessary solutions to rein in our debt. All the politicians want to do is get re-elected. They don't want to tell the public what must be done to fix the debt problem.
The politicians are scared to tell the people the facts. The politicians are afraid that they will lose votes and have to leave office if they tell the American people that sacrifices must be made; that yes, taxes will have to increase, but also all "entitlements" will have to be reduced or eliminated in many cases, or delayed. That's what's happening in Greece right now, and the people are rebelling, as they don't want their "entitlements" reduced or eliminated. So what do we do? Nothing? That's what our politicians are doing.
If your household debt was getting out of control, you would reduce spending and cut out frills as you couldn't afford them. Why isn't our government doing the same thing? That is, cut spending and try at the same time to increase income, in order to get the debt reduced to manageable numbers.
This idiocy cannot continue. We must reduce national debt now. But, our politicians don't have the guts. Greece, here we come!
HOWARD W. MOFFATT
Winston Salem
Womble's recovery
While we are glad to see N.C. Rep. Larry Womble's recovery ("Womble says he won't run," Feb 22), it was a puzzling and sad missed opportunity. Everyone was enthralled with his first public comment since the accident, noting his now "strong voice," friends "excited to hear" him and praising his "consistent voice for fair and equal treatment of all people."
In his long-anticipated first public comment, Womble didn't mention the accident, express remorse to the family of David Allen Carmichael or explain what he remembered about his car crossing the center line and taking the life of another human being. The very best that can be said about Womble on the night of Dec. 2 is that he was not driving with alcohol in his system — yet his driving skill and attention compared unfavorably with the victim of this accident, who was over the legal limit for driving after alcohol consumption. Until there is, at a minimum, some public expression of regret, let's not get so excited about politics and talk of a comeback.
ARCH EMBLER
Winston-Salem
Protecting marriage?
Amendment One is the crowning achievement of a General Assembly that has managed to marginalize and alienate just about everyone. In reference to state Rep. Paul "Skip" Stam's comment in the Feb. 19 article "Marriage law stirs legal issues," I would say our legislators are the ones who have tried to take voter's eyes off the ball.
I can see that many people could be harmed, emotionally or financially, by this amendment. What I can't understand is: Who will this help?
The only thing I've heard supporters say is "this is needed to protect marriage." Who the heck is marriage? We are putting an institution ahead of human beings? Well, I guess if corporations are people, marriage has the same rights as citizens.
What kind of convoluted logic is this?
I think the majority of North Carolina voters are decent, compassionate people who realize how unjust and unwarranted this amendment is. There is not enough love in this world, and we need to respect the rights of others even if we don't agree with them. What we don't need, and should not tolerate, are lawmakers who manufacture problems to distract us from the real challenges we face.
MELODY THOMSON
Winston-Salem
OT...from last night. "Civil War, our greatest disaster, maybe not?". Maybe not indeed. More like greatest tragedy. Reconstruction and its immediate aftermath (the counter insurgency)period might be our greatest disaster.
ReplyDeleteTragedy, disaster, whatever...the point is that Reconstruction wouldn't have happened if the war had not happened.
DeleteIf Buchanan had had Jackson's backbone, on December 21, 1860 he would have declared martial law in South Carolina, dispatched US troops to reinforce the Charleston garrison and hanged a few people for treason. I think that that might have made everyone begin thinking a little more clearly.
It has been said that nothing focuses the mind like a hanging.
DeleteI highly recommend 1857: A Nation on The Brink by Kenneth Stamp and Ordeal of the Union Volumes 3 and 4
Delete3. Douglas, Buchanan, and Party Chaos, 1857–1859;
4. Prologue to Civil War, 1859–1861; by Allan Nevins.
That's Stampp with two p's.
DeleteLte2...no our pols don't have the guts to do what you mention. How can they if we the voters tear them to bits if they do. America is not Greece yet, we are between Spain and Italy to use the Garlic Belt as comparison. We have a political, cultural and social status quo that must be preserved at all costs, just like most other developed nations. No matter that the edge of the cliff is in sight. Our world is over leveraged and awash in debt. This global debt ponzi will break soon enough and then what has to be done will be done.
ReplyDeleteGood afternoon folks!
ReplyDeleteLTE 1:"No one can seriously argue that a Christian government should lead prayer but shouldn't feed the poor." - that's the point that too many don't seem to get: this is not in any way shape or form a Christian theocratic govt. The US is a secular republic that is neutral towards all faiths. Govt is required to have a secular intent for all of its actions according to SCOTUS.
LTE 2: Comparing Greece to the US is the proverbial apples vs. oranges. It would be more accurate to compare Greece to an individual state like CA. Comparing the US budget to a household budget is like comparing apples to the entire farming industry. The deficits are a byproduct of the economic turbulence of the last 3 1/2 years and the corresponding high UR. As the economy improves and people go back to work, the deficit will come down.
LTE 3: I regard that as a private matter between Mr. Womble and the family of the deceased.
LTE 4: "Who will this help?" - those legislatures vying for the theocratic vote. There will come a day when the equivalent of Loving v. VA for gays comes before SCOTUS which will result in the overturning of all these bigoted laws and amendments.
Mr. Osborne, it's because those so-called Christians don't worship Christ...they worship a weird gun-toting Jesus/Ayn Rand hybrid.
ReplyDeleteI really don't understand those people.