Your future
As a very small investor in Berkshire Hathaway, the Journal's parent company, I strongly object to the Oct. 14 editorial endorsing Barack Obama for president (“Obama is the best choice for president). We are still dependent on foreign oil, our economy is worse, more people out of work, many household incomes are less, his foreign policies haven't worked as evidenced by insufficient protection for our embassy in Libya in spite of it asking for more help (plus Americans not being told the obvious truth), worldwide loss of respect for our country, gas prices were $1.86 when he took office, plus the health-care law is a mess. If anyone believes taxes will remain where they are for the vast majority, join the world of broken promises and “hope and change” of the last four years.
It appears obvious that none of the five on the editorial board have seen the documentary, 2016: Obama’s America, about Obama's life from birth to the presidency. The documentary was in our theaters and can be purchased on DVD. Everyone should see the documentary and get to know our president before casting a vote in this election. Your future depends upon your knowledge.
DELORES K. MacKAY
Winston-Salem
Fair and patient
I hope everyone will vote to re-elect Tori Roemer for District Court judge. She is fair and patient in her courtroom and has even stayed after midnight to complete a family law hearing. Her experience and thoughtful temperament make her uniquely qualified to maintain her seat on the bench.
My colleagues and I don't always get the rulings we might want, but Judge Roemer always decides case rulings based on what she thinks is right. She never plays favorites but correctly applies the law to the facts of each case. Vote for Roemer!
SUSAN H. GRAY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
Winston-Salem
Reporter or columnist?
Once again (with greater frequency) Scott Sexton's opinion column has appeared on the front page of the Journal (“Judge’s courtroom is filled with one-liners,” Oct. 18). No disrespect to Sexton; however, opinion sections are not part of news. A news reporter is required to accurately present a story with factual information and no opinion so that readers becomes informed and can reach their own decision. A columnist tells a story with a very clear agenda and opinion; he or she is not bound by the rules of news reporting (factual or accurate). News reporters (and the publisher) face potential lawsuits for liable/slander for misrepresenting facts, even for public figures. Columnists do not face the same potential for liable/slander of a public figure since it is an opinion.
I am not defending anyone, just noting that Sexton's column is misplaced — it is not news. We have an opinion section that also has noted columnists and that is where Sexton's column belongs. It does not belong on the front page of the newspaper or even the front section.
I have yet to read a newspaper from another city (or USA Today) where a columnist is in any other part of the newspaper than the designated section for columnists, letters to the editor and the like.
More power to Sexton for having the ability to influence the Journal into running his opinions on the front page. Shame on the Journal for not keeping opinions in the opinion section of the newspaper.
DAVID B. BOTCHIN
Winston-Salem
Scott Sexton, in the tradition of journalists nationwide who are clearly indentified as columnists, is expected to be accurate and to state his opinion on the front page or inside pages. — Carol Hanner, managing editor
Understands the important issues
Elisabeth Motsinger will certainly bring a breath of fresh air to our 5th Congressional District. Elisabeth is kind and generous and runs a clean campaign, refusing to engage in negative campaigning, though she is enduring her share of it.
Those of us who have known her for many years feel extremely fortunate that Elisabeth is offering to represent us. She's a strong environmentalist who cares deeply about what kind of world we leave to the next generation, our children and grandchildren. She believes in health care for all children and Medicare for seniors. She supports women's reproductive freedom, and she is a strong advocate for public schools.
Her experience on the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County school board and her work as a physician's assistant give her the credentials to understand the important issues of education and health care. Elisabeth has shown that she can work across party lines, and she will work for what is best for all of us in the N.C. 5th Congressional District.
HELEN ETTERS
Winston-Salem
In defense of Hayes
Judge Roland H. Hayes is selfless, compassionate, fair-minded, and yes, humorous. Columnist Scott Sexton is correct that Judge Hayes entertains his “captive audience” with one-liners that taken out of context might sometimes seem to be politically incorrect (“Judge’s courtroom is filled with one-liners,” Oct. 18). It must be noted, however, that when delivering his one-liners, Judge Hayes does so with a twinkle in his eye, a kindly expression on his face and without a malicious bone in his body. Moreover, he delivers one-liners only in conjunction with fair and appropriate punishment, which Sexton would probably label “cutting the defendant a break.” In fashioning such punishment, Judge Hayes considers the severity of the offense, the cost to victims, if any, and the individual circumstance of each defendant.
Judge Hayes gives careful consideration to the plight of each and every person who comes before him, both victim and defendant alike. Judge Hayes would never needlessly inconvenience victims, as Sexton asserts. Judge Hayes would “refuse to start a trial” only if necessary to insure a fair trial.
Unlike Sexton, I hope that Judge Hayes will remain on the bench for a very long time. Further I suggest that the citizens of Forsyth County should thank Judge Hayes for his service to the community, which he provides without remuneration. He is a man of exemplary character and a credit to the legal profession.
DONALD R. GATTALARO
ATTORNEY AT LAW
Winston-Salem
Simple choices
This year the election choices are simple. For those who want their lives to be run by some politician and/or government bureaucrat, President Obama is their man. However, for those who would rather make their own decisions and determine their own fate without government interference, then Mitt Romney is the one to vote for.
DONALD R. CREWS
Winston-Salem
A wealthy man is needed
If we could tax, spend and borrow our way out of this economic mess, we would be out. The “stimulus” was suppose to solve these problems. How much of that money was wasted? We cannot continue under the current agenda of printing worthless money and borrowing from China. What happens when China calls the “note?”
We need tax policies that promote savings, investment and innovation. We need open access to foreign markets and to establish a zero-tolerance policy toward countries that cheat on their trade commitments. We need to demand that China play by the rules.
We also need to eliminate the federal over-regulation that is smothering business growth and causing American companies to move overseas or to close their doors altogether. A wealthy man can do this; however, the job for the little man is gone . I'm not of wealth, although I doubt that a poor man has ever provided anyone with a job. Stop and say a blessing for the wealthy man. He is needed.
Mitt Romney will initiate comprehensive market-driven energy policies that will encourage development of American resources and reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Imagine having reduced prices of gasoline, oil and electric that will ease the monthly utility burden on all of Americans.
A Romney presidency gives me something to hope for and restores my dream. You keep the change. I never liked it in the first place. America was great before this four-year train wreck came along. Join me in voting for Romney/Ryan.
DAVID REGNERY
Mocksville
American values at crossroad
This presidential election has been crystallized as a crossroad for a continuation of American values. The true measure of our country rests with our common values of respect for initiative, respect for freedom of speech and respect for our pluralistic society with common core aspirations for advancing the principles of democracy. Public education has been an equalizer in promoting these core values and needs to be appreciated for its historical and future role.
For all of these reasons, I thank the Journal for endorsing the strongest advocate of these values, President Obama.
FLEMING A. EL-AMIN
Winston-Salem
Mitt vs. Mitt
Attention! All voters who are independent, moderate or still undecided won't have to hold their breath much longer. Mitt Romney will shortly express his agreement with their point of view on any subject, and no matter where they stand, except, of course, the conservative views he adamantly adhered to during the Republican primary. In case you haven't noticed, those are now no longer his opinion.
If elected, he will as a matter of course return to them and if possible make them the law of the land.
FRED P. MULCOX
Winston-Salem
Civics lesson
The writer of the letter “Printing money” (Oct. 18) wrongly accuses the Federal Reserve of printing a “tremendous amount” of paper money to “cover our debt” and dilute the “value of earnings and equity.” In reality, the Fed's job is to ensure an adequate supply of and maintain confidence in our currency. This happens when the Fed distributes currency to its 12 regional banks, which distribute the currency to banks, savings and loans, etc., which make the currency available to the public. How does this “cover our debt”?
The value of earnings dropped with high unemployment while the equity value dropped with the increasing foreclosures and loss of consumer purchasing power, all associated with the great recession. Money loses value because of inflation, not from the amount of paper money being printed. If you think our economy is in a period of inflation, just look at interest rates.
The writer concludes by stating “Clearly we need better leadership,” but does not specify where that leadership is needed. Yes, the president and the Senate are involved in appointing and con firming Fed board members. But after confirmation, the board members are totally independent from any executive, legislative or other political influence, pressure or control. The Fed's independence was created to keep it above political ideology.
Let's not blame the Fed or leadership for our economic woes. Let's do our homework before we make aimless accusations.
GARY MEEKS
Boonville
What our country needs
I have known Elisabeth Motsinger for more than 15 years and during that time I have known her to be an extraordinary human being with the ability to listen, think and make truly informed and intelligent decisions. Elisabeth works as a physician assistant with my husband and me at the Salem Center. She is most definitely what our country needs and more importantly what our 5th District needs to represent us in Washington, D.C.
Stop the gridlock on Capitol Hill, vote for Elisabeth Motsinger for Congress — you will not regret this decision!
ILENE TRUJILLO
Clemmons
Rule the roost
President Obama is blamed for the economy being so bad. If you will look into the ranking of the members of Congress, the majority in the U.S. House are Republican. They rule the roost, so to speak.
Don’t blame the president for what has happened to our country. Every president does his best to make us safe and secure and live well.
JERE DAILEY
Advance
The real story
The Elisabeth Motsinger story by John Hinton in the Oct. 20 Journal (“Dem had ties to guru”) buried the lead.
The real story wasn't about her ties to a guru over 25 years ago, but one about a political race for the U.S. Congress that is heating up and threatens to be very close in the end. Motsinger's candidacy was considered by some to be a long shot when she announced her campaign last year. But with three weeks until Election Day, she has narrowed the gap and there's a real chance of her becoming the next representative from the 5th Congressional District.
I expect to see more negative stories as the Foxx campaign struggles to keep up with the high road that Motsinger has taken. This election should really be about the issues and with hope, voters won't be distracted by any other sensational headlines.
KEN HART
Winston-Salem
The last time
Thanks for endorsing President Obama. The last time you endorsed the loser. We can only hope that you have done it again!
PAUL ARMSTRONG
Winston-Salem
Discouraging ads
Political ads on TV threaten the most essential right of our democracy. That's voting. Those ads discourage voting by telling us half-truths and worse.
Soon, folks on the losing side of this election will blame media bias and conspiracy. Truthfully, the losers will be decided by how many Americans who share important values become disheartened and don't vote. We go to the polls because we're convinced candidates are committed to at least one of our core beliefs and will vigorously promote it.
More conservative Republicans value gaining wealth by not having taxes forced on them that reflect the beliefs of liberal Democrats. They love free enterprise and don't like big government. Not true! Such Republicans clearly love big government when forcing their beliefs on others, for instance, telling women and their doctors they can't do what's needed to protect their health or families. Conservatives say they doubt the science that proves man-made climate change. They kid themselves and us because admitting it's a huge present danger would anger their benefactors, fossil-fuel company owners who bankroll and advertise their political untruths. Free-market conservatives see retired Americans, like my wife and I, as sheep with vouchers to be sheared by health-insurance companies.
Democrats, thoughtful Republicans and Independents, avoid being discouraged by political ads that lie to keep us from voting for Democrats. Our shared value that permits a stronger government that protects — most importantly its ridiculed “47 percent” of citizens and dying environment — absolutely must win.
RICHARD TERRY LOVELACE
Winston-Salem
Too many letters. Maybe the volume explains my headache. I don't know how Dotnet manages to critique so many each weekday. I am amazed at his stamina.
ReplyDeleteLTE 1-I am also amazed that someone who is intelligent enough to own Berkshire Hathaway stock (a small amount is worth quite a bit) could promote Dinesh D'Souza's DVD.
Also very glad that Bob is back posting the letters. I'm afraid the volume would have overwhelmed my copy and paste capabilities. Thank you Bob.
My pleasure, wordly.
DeleteI'll bet D'Souza eats at Chick-fil-A quite a bit.
DeleteFish oil, vitamin D, and lots of coffee and green tea :) Plus, I've spent years writing code for long periods of time, so this is li'l bit of analysis is cheese.
Delete
ReplyDeleteLTE #1...Your future.
As an investor in Berkshire Hathaway, you would know that when President Obama was inaugurated, shares closed at $86,250. Yesterday Shares of BRK closed at $130,582. You say you strongly object as an investor in BRK, would you not have objected to the endorsement had you not been an investor in BRK? What do you think of the Warren Buffet and the Buffet Rule?
"We are still dependent of foreign oil" Yes, and Canada is our largest supplier and we import from Canada over twice as much as from our 2nd largest supplier, Saudi Arabia (July, 2012 92k barrels from CA and 45k barrels from SA). When finished, the Keystone Pipeline will bring us more "foreign" oil. Mexico is our 3rd largest supplier, just behind SA. According to CSmonitor and other news sources, US production of crude and other liquid hydrocarbons is set to jump 7 percent in 2012, making it the fourth straight year of crude increases and the biggest single-year gain since 1951. Wow, 4 straight years of crude increases? I say 4 more years.
"Our Economy is worse?" Tell that to your broker. When President Obama took office, GDP was declining at 9%, the country was LOsing jobs at a rate of 750,000 per month, we were in the worse recession since the Great Depression, and you are saying it's worse now? How so?
"Many household incomes are less" True, but not for those at the top. Those have increased to extent only known in the 1920's. And according to FORBES: The sluggish economy has median national household incomes falling to around 2007 levels, but have risen since January 2009 when Obama took the helm of the world’s most powerful economy...median household incomes were $49,777 in 2009 and rose to $50,054 last year. This year’s numbers are not yet available. (10/23/12)
Libya is a national and international tragedy still being sorted out. If you know the "obvious truth," please share it as even our intelligence agencies have not come to any final conclusions.
Gas prices WERE $1.86 when the President was inaugurated, but BKA was also only 86K a share. Gas prices were ave $4.12 in July, 2008 before the world and US economy exploded. Recently gas prices have fallen, but I suppose that must be a conspiracy. "Most of the country is heading appreciably lower the next few weeks,'' says Tom Kloza of the Oil Price Information Service, who notes wholesale prices in some key markets have dropped from as high as $4.35 a gallon to $2.71.
Obama's America, 2016, by the proven liar and philanderer, formerly president of Kings College, Dinesh D'Souza.
Libya is a national and international tragedy still being sorted out. If you know the "obvious truth," please share it as even our intelligence agencies have not come to any final conclusions.
Delete________
I think the American people have come to quite a few conclusions, and they're not favorable for Obama either.
I'm an American. Drawing conclusions prematurely is hazardous at best, but I'm sure many have drawn conclusions.
DeleteLTE #6... Simple Choices
ReplyDeleteNice try, but women would like to be able to make Choices about their own healthcare and bodies without the interference of Old White Men with bad haircuts who think rape comes in all shapes and fashions or is ordained by some deity. Adult citizens would like to be able to marry other adult citizens that they love rather than have the government decide who can and cannot get married.
Thanks for endorsing President Obama. The last time you endorsed the loser. We can only hope that you have done it again!
ReplyDeletePAUL ARMSTRONG
___________
Excellent letter Mr. Armstrong. The Journal knows quite a bit about losing and losers.
Rush should be working there.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRush, the self proclaimed genius, is always doing something idiotic.
ReplyDeleteYesterday, in Rush's daily cockeyed rant, he outlined how there was all this voter fraud throughout the country being perpetrated by the GOP. Somehow in his pencil eraser sized brain, he rationalized that readers wouldn't notice that he failed to mention one of the biggest recent stories about voter fraud in the country. And it was not about the GOP's misconduct, it was about a Democrat's.
Rep Jim Moran (D) of Virginia son's resigned from his campaign after he was video taped planning to cast fraudulant votes. He also may be facing criminal charges.
Take a read:
http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=226736
Good AM, folks!
ReplyDeleteI heard on NPR this AM that the Obama campaign has raised $1B. Wow, that Citizens United decision really stacked the deck against him, didn't it? And he is in a favorable ad buy position, as his campaign gets a discount on ads while the 3rd parties supporting Romley pay full tilt. I bet we don't hear quite so much aggrieved hand wringing over CU if Obama wins.
You will from me. It has nothing to do with which side benefits. It is a bad idea, and the idea that a corporation is a person directly contradicts the reason for creating a corporation in the first place.
DeleteMike, I believe all campaigns get the preferential ad rates, so the Romney campaign get the same rate as the Obama campaign. The difference is that super-pacs don't get these special rates so groups like Crossroads and Priorities USA have to pay the going market ad rates.
DeleteTV/radio ad spending has been 50% higher this year than in 2008, thanks to the floodgates opened by Citizens United.
DeleteAll presidential campaigns get the same discount...it's called the lowest unit rate. The outside, secret money pays full rate.
The Obama campaign has run more ads than Romney because most of their ads are paid out of money that they have raised, while most of Romney's comes from outsiders. For instance, the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future did not make its bookings in the summer and is placing ad buys just days before the spots air, jacking up prices even more. In Norfolk, Va., last week, ROF paid $10,455 to air an ad on CBS station WTKR during the Tuesday prime-time, crime drama "NCIS" — more than double the $4,705 the Obama campaign was charged for the same show.
That is their fault, no one else's. If you're happy with a campaign financed by anonymous donors, that's your problem.
Obama has also gotten better placement because they buy their ads well in advance, while Romney buys 3-4 days beforehand, when much of the best placement is unavailable.
The official Obama campaign has raised far more money than Romney's, $646 million to $393 million. But other funds, including national committee and special funds, put them nearly even. By the time it is over, both campaigns will have spent over a billion each. Ridiculous.
OT and Wordly, your comments better and more fully reflect the reporting than did my hasty entry.
DeleteWe don't have yesterday's early voting totals yet, but in a poll released yesterday, PPP asked NC early voters who they had voted for...
ReplyDeleteObama 57%, Romney 42%
So Obama 565,318, Romney 416,550
A lot of Democrats don't work. That's why Obama is leading at this point, bozo.
DeleteAre you a Democrat then. Cause you don't work.
DeleteHow do you know I don't work? A lot of people goof off at work and play on the internet. Especially Democrats.
DeleteBased on my unscientific observations, I agree with your analysis re early voting.
ReplyDeleteI told a friend I had voted early. He said he'd vote on Election Day, just didn't feel like real voting, otherwise.
Stab, Mrs WW and I voted yesterday. Being a Republican, I can't vote often, so instead I voted vigorously....instead of touching the screen, I mashed the blocks real good so they would be sure to take.
DeleteThere is that excellent all-purpose word again, "mash".
DeleteOne of my favorite female friends, a research scientist at WFBMC, says she grew up on a dirt farm in Bama. One time a man asked her what they grew there...she gave him a withering look and said "I just told you, mostly dirt."
Recently she had an encounter with a huge Mexican cockroach. "I mashed that scutter good," she told me. Another word I hadn't heard lately.
You can take the gal out of the country, but...and so on.
I remembered to use the word "mash" after the last time I used it. This time, it is an accurate description. Mrs WW grew up on a farm and always heard dirt farm, though not hers. She says you can tell a "dirt farm" by the amount of dust and dirt the truck makes when driving down the road to the house. My Dad used the term "scutter" as in rascal etc. I do enjoy words and wordsmiths. One of my all time favorites was the late Dizzy Dean of Cardinals fame. I loved his expressions and those that talked like him. If a base runner "slud" into second base...it was a seeable event.
Delete"mash," "scutter," "slud": all excellent descriptors.
DeleteYes, Diz was a peach.
DeleteWatching a rookie pitcher warm up, he said "Pee Wee, that boy could thow (sic) a strawberry thew a locomotive."
Of course my favorite was when Roger Maris was on second base and somebody singled to right. Diz couldn't pronounce Maris's name, so settled for Mars.
Diz: "They're wavin' Mars on so he's comin' home and here comes the thow and Mars is, Mars is...folks, they nailed him to th' cross."
There was a long silence, then Pee Wee was talking and Diz wasn't. There was some flack about it, but Diz wasn't fired, as some have said.
That came in 1966 when the Game of the Week moved from CBS to NBC and one sponsor, Falstaff beer, insisted that Dean leave. He was replaced by Curt Gowdy. Sad.
Turned on NPR on way to work, hit a Word Watch trifecta in a couple of minutes: "ramped up," "doesn't get it," "in the tank." I finished the drive in silence. What passes for oratory and analysis these days is sadly banal.
ReplyDeleteThey know their dedicated audience pretty well and so must tailor their verbage for them.
DeleteWOW! With all these endorsements, somebody is just liable to win.
ReplyDeleteActually, the stale verbiage was on the part of interviewees and a campaign sound bite, not that the news readers are immune.
ReplyDelete"You've got to be able to weather the storm when the wheels start coming off."
Delete___WF linebacker after Clemson whupping last night.
Speaking of campaign sound bites, one report prior to my departure into silence stated that by campaign's end appx 1MM presidential ads will have been run. The report did not say over what time span, but regardless, that is several thousand ads per day, spread unevenly over media markets, with certain states heavily targeted. Saturation to excess.
ReplyDelete"You've got to be able to weather the storm when the wheels start coming off."
ReplyDeleteIt apparently was sufficiently stormy to blow wheels off, 35-7 at half. I have no idea what the final score was.
Speaking of sports, is there some law that American League relief pitchers in World Series must walk the first batters they face?
42-13 was the final.
DeleteYou might be thinking of the American League Law of Walking: Expanded Terms (or ALL WET) which requires AL relief pitchers to walk the first batter they face.
NC early voting through end of day Thursday:
ReplyDeleteTot: 1,164,655 (up 22% from same day in 2004)
Dem: 585,468
Rep: 358,147
Ind: 218,948
Lib: 2,092 (Almost 400% increase from 2008)
Obama: 663,853
Romney: 489,155
Again meaningless dribble. Democrats vote early because they don't have jobs and are on food stamps.
DeleteTot: 1,164,655 (up 22% from same day in 2004)
DeleteHee Hee, you gotta love Rush. He's such a weasel. Why isn't he reporting that it's down from 2008? Because he knows that means Obama is in trouble.
I tell you, that Buckboy is sharp...make a mistake and he'll nail you to the wall every time. Of course, it usually ends up with him "stepping in something", as Andy Griffith once put it.
DeleteSo I made a mistake above by typing the wrong date. Should have been 2008 instead of 2004. Here's the figures:
Eleven days before Election Day:
2008: 953,760
2012: 1,164,655
As pointed out, up 22% this year from 2008. These numbers, BTW, come from Art Pope's little Fascist outfit, Civitas, down in Raleigh.
VOCABULARY MALFUNCTION #7,354: It's "drivel", not "dribble". One would expect Buckboy to be an expert on "drivel", the production of which is his chief occupation.
"Dribble" is what Michael Jordan used to do now and then, or what Buckboy does when he's hanging out in public toilets.
You're dribbling from your mouth with your ridiculous BS. I used the correct word.
DeleteYou never let a chance to make a fool of yourself go by, do you Rush?
Boy Scouts had 'Perversion Files'.
ReplyDeleteHomosexual pedophiles ran rampant in the Boy Scouts for years.
___________
Menghi's file is just one among 14,500 pages of "perversion files" compiled by the Boy Scouts of America between 1959 to 1985 and made public last week by court order.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/26/faced-with-release-his-long-secret-file-former-nc-scoutmaster-admits-molesting/#ixzz2AQate0RR
Good afternoon folks!
ReplyDeleteLTE 1: "As a very small investor in Berkshire Hathaway..." -very small investor? She must own the BRK_B shares ($86.79), because at $130k per share for the A series, there is no such thing as a "very small" BRK investor. Phargo did a very good job of explaining how the rest of the LTE is complete BS. Buffett gives his papers' editorial staffs complete reign over op-ed content. BTW...D'Souza's movie is wild-eyed speculation based on gross misinterpretations of Obama's words, not knowledge.
LTE 2, 4, 8, 11: Endorsement
LTE 3: I do not recall ever seeing Sexton's columns referred to as anything other than an opinion column. Don't know if it's just me, but I have no difficulty discerning between an article and a column. As far as where Sexton's columns should go, I'll leave that up to the editors. It's certainly not worth huffing and puffing over. Good clarification from Ms. Hanners concerning the accuracy requirements for Mr. Sexton.
LTE 5: A more legit criticism of Sexton's column. As a columnist, Sexton takes an "as I see it" approach. I suppose everyone on this forum is aware that the public perceptions of how we do our individual jobs is often quite different from the reality. As an attorney, Gattalaro is in a position to view Judge Hayes from an insider's viewpoint and present a more accurate portrait of Judge Hayes' courtroom performance.
LTE 6: Ah, yes life and its choices are very simple when you have a binary view which requires little to no thinking.
LTE 7: Endorsement, but so much misunderstanding of how our economy works. The stimulus was a stop gap to stop the bleeding and bring some stability until consumers (70% of GDP) were able to get back on their feet. The vast majority is borrowed from the Fed Reserve and US citizens. The current problem is a lack of demand which translates into a need for fewer employees which means a higher UR. As for a poor man never providing a job, the man who hired me to work on his strawberry farm was certainly not rich, and the Pizza Hut manager who hired me would have been classified as poor if he had a wife and children. Jobs was making $5 / hr and Wozniak was bouncing rent checks when they founded Apple Computer. "Mitt Romney will initiate..." yeah, Romney will initiate, but Congress will then give Romney's initiatives the finger, just as it did Obama's initiatives. "A Romney presidency gives me something to hope for and restores my dream" - Lordy have mercy, Mr. Regnery must lead a sad, sad life if he's pending all of his hopes and dreams on a POTUS candidate.
LTE 9: A take on a Grouchoism.
LTE 10: Thank God for Mr. Meeks for finally providing an accurate view of the Fed and its role in the economy.
LTE 12: Blaming anyone person, especially the President for the economy's struggles is just stupid. The Fed chairman has far more influence on the economy than the POTUS, and even his actions are dwarfed by the purchasing decisions of millions of consumers.
LTE 13: The 5th has long been gerrymandered in favor of the R's, so Motsinger or any D is facing long odds unless new D's have moved into the neighborhood. Is the race really that close?
LTE 14: To be seen
LTE 15: TV was already virtually unwatchable prior to the onslaught of political ads. Between that and all the phone calls, it's just entirely too much. I'm sick and tired of political ads, and I'm sick and tired of coming home to the same phone message from the RNC every single freaking day.
Richard Mourdock and Todd Aiken are not the only Republican politicians who think rape is an act of god.
ReplyDeleteThe Republican National Coalition for Life has endorsed eight other GOP Senate candidates: George Allen (Va.), Rep. Rick Berg (N.D.), Ted Cruz (Texas), Deb Fischer (Neb.), Sen. Dean Heller (Nev.), Rep. Pete Hoekstra (Mich.), Josh Mandel (R-Ohio) and Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.).
There are also five other GOP Senate candidates who hold this position: Michael Baumgartner (Wash.), Wendy Long (N.Y.), John MacGovern (Vt.), John Raese (W.Va.) and Tom Smith (Pa.).
Vote for life and rape babies...vote ★★★Republican★★★
I should mention that the Republican National Coalition for Life states its criteria thusly:
ReplyDeleteSelected candidates must be "unconditionally pro-life" and "recognize the inherent right to life of every innocent human being, from conception until natural death, without discrimination."
Except, er, uh, of course, in case of war and capital punishment...we're in favor of both of those.
"Hail, hail, the gang's all here,
Kill a Jap for breakfast,
What the hell do we care,
Hail, hail, the gang's all here,
Shoot a Mitsubishi down!"
Crap 70s Rock Stars Tend to Be Republicans
ReplyDeleteDon't know why. It's another mystery of the universe.
Think about it...Ted Nugent, Gene Simmons, Alice Cooper. It's weird.
DeleteAwfully hilarious or hilariously awful...Paradise by the Dashboard Light it ain't.
DeleteI particularly liked this comment:
"Vote for Romney???
Well, I would do anything for love, but I won't do that."
Appreciated your reply re: paranoia the other night OT. It made me think, which is always a dangerous thing.
DeleteOver 1,000 people are filing disability claims a day under Obama's leadership. The highest in history. 'Dependency' is a wonderful thing, ain't it?
ReplyDeleteHow does that compare with previous stats? And remember, the population increases. More people, more a lot of things.
DeleteAs usual, you won't get an answer from Buckboy.
DeleteAnd as always, he's quoting a loony source, the Christian News Service (CNS).
The number of disability claims in the last Clinton year were about 1.3 million. By 2008, that number had risen to about 2.3 million, an increase of 76% during the Bush years.
As anyone who actually thinks can figure out, there was a big spike in 2009, the first year to be affected by the Bush crash, to about 2.8 million, an increase of 22% in one year. That number has remained fairly steady ever since, and has actually declined slightly during the Obama term.
But the percentage of claims actually approved has dropped, from a peak of around 44% during the Bush years to 33% the last 2 quarters.
And the largest increases in people actually receiving disability payments have been 5.95% in 2003, 5.58% in 2004 and 5.34% in Obama's 2nd year, 2010. Last year, the increase fell to 4.53%. This year, the percentage of increase has dropped each quarter, from .95% in Q1, to .87% in Q2, to .6% in Q3…the projection for the year is under 3%, which would be the lowest increase since 1997.
As always, Buckboy is, as Dizzy Dean would have said, "Just a-whoofin'."