Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE TU 10/16/12


Trickle-down theory
For years pundits have been having the same debate: should we place regulations on the economy? Conservatives have, time and time again, responded with a resounding no. They support trickle-down economics, the theory that directing money used for health care and public education toward tax cuts for wealthy Americans will lead to job growth.
The problem with this plan is that it is proven not to work.
Under President Bush, wealthy Americans were given massive tax cuts, one in 2001 and the other in 2003, under the idea that this would lead to job growth. It did not. Under that same president, companies like Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and AIG didn’t have to abide by strong regulations and, as a result, their profits soared, but so did health-insurance premiums. When salaries did not rise with the skyrocketing premium costs, American families were denied medical help when they needed it most. Families bought homes they couldn’t afford, stupid bets were made with other people’s money on the line and our economy nearly collapsed. We had the slowest job-growth rate in 30 years under Bush.
Make no mistake: I believe that companies should be allowed to succeed and grow without constant monitoring. But I also believe that some regulations must be enacted to ensure the success of the nation as a whole. A strong middle class is the backbone of the United States, not the coffers of CEOs and brokers.
Trickle down doesn’t work. This shouldn’t even be an issue.
JOHN BELMONT
Winston-Salem
Time and effort
The Raleigh-based Voter Integrity Project says there are 27,561 dead people registered to vote in North Carolina; the State Board of Elections says 4,946 are verifiable (“County, group at odds over voter rolls,” Sept. 27). The numbers are too high, whether it is 27,561 or 4,946.
A lot of time and effort went into what the project asserts to be an accurate count of dead people, but it is unlikely this was truly an effort to prove there is a systematic scheme to defraud our voting system, or even an effort to improve it. The project's director, Jay DeLancy, who has ties to True to Vote, has found evidence of potential voter fraud. Whether dead people could potentially perpetrate fraud is unclear because DeLancy cannot say until the data is analyzed.
Coincidentally, the search for dead people led the project to find 1,165 people on the voter registration rolls who were non-citizens. Coincidentally, the impetus for voter ID comes from Republicans who accuse Democrats of touting Hispanic votes; somehow the charge has evolved to include illegal immigrants. Coincidentally, the Voter Integrity Project website says the group is non-partisan . Hmm.
The project can certainly claim success in removing 11 of 528 registered non-citizens in Wake County and 10 of 637 in Forsyth County. It is not apparent if those removed actually voted in past elections, but Republicans should be relieved to know that there will be 21 fewer votes for Democrats in the 2012 general election.
ANGIE MENDEZ
Winston-Salem
Fairly and impartially
I began my law-enforcement career in 1978 and I learned early on that one of the main reasons our great nation stands above all others is our belief in the rule of law. Our judicial system is not and never will be perfect, but I believe it is a model example for the world to observe.
For our judicial system to continue to be a shining example, it is imperative that the people within that system be of high moral character, unquestionable honesty and a willingness to apply our laws fairly and impartially. It is for these reasons I would like to offer my endorsement to re-elect Judge Victoria Roemer for Forsyth District Court. I have known Judge Roemer for many years and I know she possess these attributes.
I encourage everyone to vote to re-elect Victoria Roemer as district court judge.
DEAN A. CRAWFORD
TROOPER, N.C. HIGHWAY PATROL (RET.)
Kernersville
If what you want …
If we want to be less free, less safe and less prosperous, we should re-elect President Barack Obama.
If we want to change American culture — where dependency is noble and virtuous, and success is diminished and demeaned — we should re-elect Barack Obama.
If we want more people on the dole, we should re-elect Barack Obama.
If we want a national energy policy that begets increasingly higher gasoline, heating oil and electricity prices, we should re-elect Barack Obama.
If we want degraded medical care — particularly for the very young, the elderly and the disabled — we should re-elect Barack Obama.
If we want a hollowed-out military, selective enforcement of federal laws, suppression of free speech and a nullified Constitution, we should re-elect Barack Obama.
And if we want a new N.C. 5th District congresswoman who supports the backward transformation of our country, we should elect the self-professed “progressive” candidate, Elisabeth Motsinger, whose leftward positions are simpatico with Barack Obama’s.
I urge citizens to vote as if the country’s future depends upon it — for it absolutely does. As for me, I will cast my votes for Mitt Romney and Rep. Virginia Foxx — and for every candidate down the ballot who opposes Barack Obama’s march toward an America no longer characterized by liberty, but by tyranny.
DEBORAH S. “DEB” PHILLIPS
Lewisville
Standing up
Vote early, it's easy. I will vote for Elisabeth Motsinger because she stands up for the environment. Yes, we need jobs, but not at the expense of the planet. Elisabeth will stand up to big polluters and protect the environment.
DAN TYRRELL
Winston-Salem
Sad and frightening
My mother taught me many invaluable lessons. Two were, “dress for the job you want, not the job you have,” and “care for your belongings — they need to last.”
Regrettably, Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., our country's greatest path to our front door, has just been added to the most endangered landscapes list because of lack of maintenance and years of neglect. Additionally, our Capitol Dome has been seriously leaking for years and needs to be repaired quickly.
What a sad and frightening commentary of our country!
I believe that almost every American would be mortified to learn that these two symbols of our country are falling into such horrible states of disrepair. Yet we do know, and we seem either incapable or unwilling to do anything about it.
As a Navy veteran and a proud American, I want our leaders to do what my mother taught me; take care of our belongings and dress to impress. Pennsylvania Avenue and the Capitol Dome are both of these. We owe it to our Founding Fathers to ensure that they continue to represent us as they were intended, with respect, admiration and awe.
I want and demand that these and other symbols of our country are cared for and maintained into the future. On Nov. 6, I will vote for the one who I feel best understands these obligations. I want to move forward , not to keep cutting spending so that I am forced to continue to watch this painful and continual deterioration of our country.
GLYNIS JORDAN
Winston-Salem
Pollution plague
“Fracking” has become the latest buzzword to identify the latest pollution plague of our state. Gas producers have found a ripe grape ready to pick. North Carolina is not a petroleum-producing state so does not have the infrastructure and protections that such a petroleum-producing state would have. As I stated earlier, we are a ripe grape ready for the picking. The petroleum industry knows this and believe me when I say it will feast.
Those who don’t want to see wells pop up like cell towers and our underground water, more precious than oil or gas, polluted, need to get involved now. Start with November. See how our representatives voted on the fracking bill and the subsequent governor’s veto, and if he or she is up for reelection, let them know where it hurts.
I believe if we as concerned citizens of this state look at the record of fracking we will see it is not for this state.
JERRY HOLDSCLAW
Westfield

14 comments:

  1. Great letter Sombra!

    Typically shrill and dishonest letter from everyone's favorite far-right photographer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. LTE #4... If What you want.
    If you really think the Sky is Falling, you should vote Cocky Locky Mitt and Henny Penny Paul and the world will live happily ever after.

    And it came to pass, all that seemed wrong.
    Was now right and those who deserved to.
    Were certain to live a long and happy life.
    Ever after, ever after.

    Journey over, all is mended.
    And it's not just for today.
    But tomorrow and extended.
    Ever after, ever after.

    All the curses have been ended.
    The reverses wiped away.
    All is tenderness and laughter.
    For forever after.

    Happy now and happy hence.
    And happy ever after...

    ReplyDelete
  3. LTE #1... Trickle down theory.
    So True! Mitt Romney is a perfect example that Trickle Down is Con-speak for Flowing Out

    ReplyDelete
  4. LTE #2... Time and effort
    Your efforts are right on time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Left overs:

    Mike was correct, the Journal did endorse Motsinger today. I was kind of surprised. I don't think the Journal is going have a winning record as far as its endorsements for democrats are concerned.

    The endorsement of Obama has gotten national attention at least on Twitter.


    Last night's discourse did return to the frequent union vs anti-union thread of this blog.

    I too find it disheartening that the Koch brothers would threaten their employees with job loss if they vote to reelect Obama although this tactic is considered by many constitutional scholars to be protected free speech.

    The Kochs primary contention is that they can't afford a return to the Clinton tax rates since they are a "small business" with earnings over $250,000 per year. They are aggressively seeking to protect their favored tax status and small business welfare largess. Other than maybe keeping their jobs, the majority of their employees will see little if any benefit from this tax policy. Romney has stated that he wants to broaden the tax base. Translation, the little people will pay more the purported "job creators" will pay less. Education, infrastructure, the environment and middle class purchasing power will suffer as a result.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We all know that our beloved leader detests unions.

      I realize that in the past when unions were very strong they did participate in many unscrupulous and strong arm tactics.

      Although, I don't have any first hand knowledge, I do believe that today's unions are more aligned with protecting workers than protecting union bosses jobs and power.

      The main difference I see between alleged union voter coercion and Koch brother coercion is that union activities more broadly benefit the masses. Examples include 40 hours work week, paid vacation, sick time, health care and retirement benefits. Even is you don't work for a unionized company you may benefit from these union fought for benefits because your employer offers then to ward off the union nemeses.

      The Koch brothers on the other hand are all about tax benefits for them and them alone. They are the makers and the rest of us are the takers, and if they can find cheaper takers in this globalized economy they will.

      Delete
    2. This whole business about higher taxes preventing companies from hiring workers because it reduces earnings is pure poppycock. Taxes are levied on profits which is revenues minus expenses. Labor costs are part of expenses. Adding labor increases expenses which lowers profit which reduces the amount to be taxed. If companies are really concerned about increased tax rates, then hire more workers, increase your expenses, reduce your profit, then you won't have to worry about higher rates!

      Delete
  6. Good AM, Wordly. 40h weeks, vacation and sick time, health care, etc., are a part of the workplace, and have been so for decades. No one is going to the barricades over those now.

    Unions' primary objective most recently has been to have legislation passed (sponsored in part by Obama as a Senator) to supplant free choice with unionization by coercion. No worker protection involved in that, or with the subsequent efforts to supplant secret ballot by NLRB fiat. Interesting that an institution regarded as so benign in this forum seeks to increase its membership without the free consent of potential members, and then to use those members' money for political purposes without their consent.

    My esteemed cousin has previously suggested that allowing recruitment by pressgang will have little effect on the economy. That is irrelevant, true or not. Requiring NC women to have ultrasounds prior to abortions has little effect on the economy, but is likewise an invasion of privacy and a violation of rights. And there is a fair amount of indignation on this site, shared by me, about that. But when I mention union coercion, well gee, that doesn't matter. That outlook, unfortunately, is shared by judges, legislators, and bureaucrats all too often.

    My cuz likens my opposition to unions as supporting the Koch Bros and their ilk. Nope, they are two separate issues. Opposing the efforts of unions does not undermine my well-being. Unions, with their featherbedding, work rules, wildcat strikes, absenteeism, and overcompensation (as in the case of pre-bailout (and some post-) UAW workers, costs me money. That is to say the 7% of union workers are excessively redistributing my income to themselves. Remember, we of the 99% pay for all those union payrolls and benefits, not to mention getting to subsidize union support of pols who vote contrary to my wishes.

    My cousin OT is right on one count: I am confident that he makes more than I. I'm not sure what that really means in this discussion. I have a feeling that as independent a gent as he is, unions have little or nothing to do with his success in the business arena.



    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh we're the bright young men
    Who wanta go back to 1910
    We're Barry's Boys...

    Well, I’m now convinced that unions are evil and that they have abused the poor little corporations for decades…I think that we should join together and undo all that union evil and put thing back the way they were.

    So let’s hear it for the six day, 72 hour work week. 16.7 cents an hour. If we scrimp and save like Ann Romney did, we can afford to grab a quick beer on Saturday night before the world shuts down for Sunday Jesus time, protected by the blue laws.

    Vacation? The average Joe would just waste it wandering around Disney World.

    And why should people get paid for being sick? Health insurance? Take two aspirins and get back to work.

    If you can walk you can work, so forget retirement…when it’s time to retire we’ll call the funeral home for you.

    I really like children, so its great being able to work right alongside them on the production line. And look over there under that machine…a couple of babies in a box…every day since grandma died…aren’t they having fun?

    I do wonder sometimes why so many people in here are missing fingers and parts of fingers, and I wonder what all this heat and dust is doing to my health, but what the hell, that’s the price you pay for living in the grand old union free USA.

    What’s that funny smell?

    ReplyDelete
  8. As noted, the 40h week has been with us a while. I believe it is enshrined in law. I have health insurance thru my non-union employer, and sick pay, and vacation pay, and holiday pay. Those are not going away, whether the unionization rate is 25% or 2.5%.

    You are again replying apocalyptically. Also, I said nothing about alleged union abuse of corporations. I noted unions' coercion of individuals, which you ignore, and the effect of unions on my 99% wallet, and unions' confiscation of money for political use without consent.

    Then there is the Obama administration spending our money to punish employees who decertified the IAM. Social justice, hmmmm?

    I'm fine with collective bargaining, provided membership is freely entered into, a point also ignored.

    I'm done with the subject for a time. Reply at will with "bullshit" or pertinent arguments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Federal law covers some specific jobs, requiring overtime pay after 40 hours per week. After that there is a polyglot of state laws. Virtually all such laws, along with all of the other benefits mentioned, are the result of union activity.

      Most salaried jobs are exempt. The current practice of the 40 hour week is attributable to competition for workers, and varies widely. Salaried professionals, especially in large law firms and highly competitive businesses are expected to work however many hours it takes to get the job done. A young lawyer unwilling to put in 60 hours or so a week will not have a job for long.

      Every now and then a particularly brilliant businessman has an effect on such matters. In 1913, workers in Henry Ford’s factory were paid $2.50/day for a 9 hour work day.

      Operating on some thoughts and a hunch, in early 1914 Ford doubled his workers pay and cut the day to 8 hours. His rivals were furious, but had no choice but to follow when Ford’s productivity increased sharply, doubling his annual profit in only two years.

      Anyone who thinks that their work week and benefits are set in stone ought to take a look around. Over the past few years, millions of American workers have seen significant changes in work regulations and benefits. No doubt, there is more to come.

      Delete
    2. Pay your employees more, give them decent benefits, and productivity goes up. Wow, how about that?

      It's probably good to treat your workers with respect too, but I'm a whackadoo lefty.

      Delete
  9. Good afternoon folks!
    LTE 1: "Trickle down", or supply-side economics actually concerns policies that enable the supply side of the economic equation (i.e. those who supply the goods and services) to operate at greater efficiency and provide more at a lower cost. Thus, you have policies that reduce regulations, make it easier to import raw materials, reduce the costs of labor, etc. Supply-side is effective under economic conditions such as what existed during the late 1970's when industry was heavily regulated and the top tax rates were in the 70% range. Those conditions do not exist today. The problems of the past 4 years have centered on the demand side of the equation with one notable exception. The difficulty in obtaining credit has been a huge detriment to both sides of the equation.

    LTE 2: Congrats to our La Sombra with her typical witty, on-the-spot analysis! Voting is a Constitutionally preserved right which took 195 years to ensure that everyone 18 or older regardless of race, gender or creed was covered. Now, we have some who want to add burdens to this right after so many years of removing them in the name of removing "fraud" that has not been proven to exist. This is nothing more than a 21st century form of the poll tax designed to place barriers on the poor (which make up a high pct of minorities), so that they become too frusrated or are too discouraged to vote.

    LTE 3, 5: Endorsement

    LTE 4: Lordy, have mercy Deb! You've built enough strawmen to serve as scarecrows for the entire state of Iowa. I don't care if you submit an endorsement for the GOP, but at least present some rational thought instead of paranoid delusions right out of Limbaughland.

    LTE 6: Oh wow, a new topic worthy of discussion! I've read about the sorry state of the grounds, streets and monuments surrounding the White House. The earthquake only added to the state of disrepair. This is a prime example of where tax dollars can be put to good use and provide jobs. The nation's capital has long been a destination for both domestic and foreign visitors. Are broken grounds and monuments really the face we want to present to the world?

    LTE 7: Not only is NC not a petroleum producing state, the reports I've read suggest NC isn't much of a natural gas producing state either. Coal is NC's major contribution to energy. Any significant source of natural gas appears to lie off the coast of NC and not within its shales.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The dome of the US Capitol has about 1300 cracks in it and is leaking like a sieve. Repairs will cost $61 million.

    The Senate has approved the expenditure, but the Grover Norquist controlled House will not go along.

    ReplyDelete