Saturday, October 20, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE SA 10/20/12


Editorial board
In reference to John Railey’s Oct. 14 column “We’re the editorial board, and we approved this message,” and the photo of the members of the board, how disappointing but not surprising to view the all-male board.
ANNETTE LANCE
Winston-Salem
Representative
The writer of the Oct. 13 letter “A proud Republican” misses the point.
In replying to the letter “Hard-right takeover” (Sept. 18) from a woman who has left the Republican Party, she touts some of the party’s past achievements — and she’s right about them. But all of those achievements are at least 50 years in the past. The woman she’s replying to left the party because it’s not like that anymore. Maybe the Republicans supported the Voting Rights Act when it was introduced, but many of them are trying to pull the rug out from under it now.
Mitt Romney and Rep. Paul Ryan are the representatives of today’s Republican Party.
They’re not standing up for anyone’s rights; one wrote off 47 percent of the country and the other 30 percent. Their economic policies shift more money from the poor to the rich — redistributing wealth — and nothing they’ve proposed would reduce the deficit. They would both like to eliminate our traditional social safety net, which would plunge even more Americans into poverty.
Today’s Republican Party is not the one that either letter writer admires. If the Republican Party represented today what the writer of “A proud Republican” says it once represented, I’d want to join it myself.
BOBBY FIELDS
Winston-Salem
Flawed survey
The Journal did a disservice in reporting the results of a survey conducted by the N.C. Bar Association purporting to evaluate district court judges running for re-election. The results of the survey are flawed (“Candidates differ on evaluations,” Oct. 9).
Full disclosure: I am an attorney. Except for one case presently pending, I never have practiced before the district court. Some of Forsyth’s County’s judges are friends; more are acquaintances. I endorse no candidate. I have had substantial experience evaluating surveys.
The survey reportedly was sent to all of the approximately 20,000 North Carolina lawyers, including more approximately 1,100 who have addresses in the 21st Judicial District (Forsyth County). Of those receiving the survey, 4,278 (about 20 percent) statewide responded and less than 300 (less than 30 percent) of the local bar responded.
While the absolute number of respondents is significant, it is the nature of those respondents that damn the survey. Those who responded do not represent a random sample. They self-selected their participation and that makes them different from the overwhelming majority of their colleagues who chose not to participate.
Did those who responded have an interest in skewing the results? Some of the candidates have numerous colleagues who may have participated with a view toward helping them. This could be done by providing very low ratings.
The survey was flawed. The bar association never should have released the results; the Journal never should have reported them without explanation.
GUY BLYNN
Winston-Salem
The path for America
No matter what the networks and Super PACs think, we know we aren't voting on who is most charismatic or better at slinging barbs in a debate. We'll be deciding what kind of country we want America to be.
What the Republicans seem to be promoting, for those of us who can afford it, is insulating ourselves inside a heavily-guarded gated community.
Let's all sock away our money, hoard resources and paint the poor, minorities and immigrants as drains on the nation instead of embracing them as integral parts of a vibrant, dynamic society. Let's restrict the rights of individuals we deem unworthy while bestowing privilege on those who already have it in abundance.
Those who believe they can thrive in this environment, good luck. But it's not the path I want America to take.
I want the America that tries to elevate the standard of living for all its people. The one that recognizes retaining our superpower status means more than having the largest military complex on earth, it also means leading the world in our infrastructure, innovation, talent, productivity and integrity. Fiscal responsibility and social compassion do not have to be mutually exclusive; we can have both.
I'm voting for the people I believe will best stand behind working families, who want us to have the best-educated workforce and the healthiest citizens in the world, and who believe that America's strength is in its diversity and its heart. I am voting for Elisabeth Motsinger for 5 th Congressional District.
MELODY THOMSON
Winston-Salem
Stunning events
The stunning events in Bengahzi, Libya on Sept. 11 showcase the vacuum of leadership in the White House. Testimony before a congressional hearing by state department officials on Oct. 10 confirm a situation where our Libyan consulate was virtually defenseless even though our ambassador had requested (and was denied) more security.
After the death of four Americans, President Obama and his representatives (Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, White House press secretary Jay Carney, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice, etc.) blamed the attack on reaction to an obscure anti-Muslim video rather than on radical Islamist terrorists' hatred for the United States. This cover-up went on for days.
Such a tragedy and the administration's response speaks volumes about a foreign policy of weakness where our enemies become fearless and our allies become fearful. Obama's domestic policies have been ineffective and costly. His foreign policy is inept and downright dangerous.
MARY LOU WILSON
Winston-Salem
Against Obama
I plan to vote against President Obama because:
He hates the nitty-gritty work of governance. In “The Price of Politics,” Bob Woodward describes how this president’s strong distaste for the governing process contributed significantly to the rancor surrounding passage of the Affordable Care Act, the collapse of congressional debt negotiations and the current political gridlock in Washington. Obama seems to like the bright spotlight of the presidency but not the hard work.
His rhetoric and policies are hurting business. Whether he’s demonizing Wall Street and big oil, using the National Labor Relations Board to block Boeing’s South Carolina plant or ordering the EPA to stop the Keystone pipeline, Obama is killing the animal spirits that lead business to invest capital and hire more workers.
His foreign policy is a disaster. Al-Qaida, described by the president as “severely weakened,” is attacking our embassies around the world. The Taliban is emboldened in Afghanistan by our announced pull-out date. Iran is racing toward a nuclear capability unfazed by economic sanctions. Israel is preparing for war. Yet, our president refused to meet with Benjamin Netanyahu in September.
He refuses accountability. Presidents Clinton and Bush both compromised to pass legislation through an opposition-controlled Congress. President Obama continues to blame Congress and President Bush for our problems, claiming no culpability of his own.
He said if he didn’t fix the economy in four years, he didn’t deserve another term. I agree.
SCOTT RHODES
Clemmons

28 comments:

  1. For those uncertain about whom to select in the election, "The Onion" has endorsed John Edwards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm planning to write-in either Anthony Weiner (D) or Barney Frank (D). I think one of them would be more qualified.

      Delete
    2. I'm also considering Rielle Hunter.

      Delete
    3. You need to think up some new material Buckums. That shit got boring a year ago.

      Delete
    4. I might could be convinced.

      1. He's from N.C.

      2. He went up against the Federal government and won.

      3. After all Ralph Reed had been resurrected by the Republicans. It's not inconceivable that the Democrats could resurrect Mr. Edwards.

      The Unlikey Ressurection of Ralph Reed

      I realize he was terrible to Elizabeth, but if Reed can return to primetime, why not Edwards?

      Delete
    5. Arthur, you being a hot-shot lawyer and all, I figured you'd have more important things to do than read my detailed and justified explanation of why Obama shouldn't be reelected. Of course, there are so many reasons, it takes days and days to do it.

      Where's your spiritual brother? I'm not through throwing him up against the 'truth' wall yet.

      Delete
    6. Arthur, you know better than to associate the verb to think (pensar) with Bucky.

      Delete
    7. Oh Jeez! Somebody keeps grabbing an alligator's tail, and then they wonder why they get bitten.

      Delete
    8. well you definitely have the brain of an alligator and you live in a swamp.

      Delete
    9. Silly me. I like to give some trolls points for creativity, but Bucky's act is staler then Henny Youngman's.

      Delete
    10. And he's been dead for 14 years.

      Delete
  2. Even the largest newspaper in UTAH, headquarters of the Mormon Church, the Salt Lake Tribune, has endorsed President Obama:
    Tribune Endorsement: Too Many Mitts
    Obama has earned another term
    Sadly, it is not the only Romney, as his campaign for the White House has made abundantly clear, first in his servile courtship of the tea party in order to win the nomination, and now as the party’s shape-shifting nominee. From his embrace of the party’s radical right wing, to subsequent portrayals of himself as a moderate champion of the middle class, Romney has raised the most frequently asked question of the campaign: "Who is this guy, really, and what in the world does he truly believe?"

    ReplyDelete
  3. "If you say you will protect a women's right to choose but you stand up in a primary debate and say you'd be delighted to sign a law outlawing that right to choose in all cases, then you have definitely got Romnesia."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you better put out the life boats Bob. I think Obama is going to need one real soon.

      Delete
    2. He's even got that 'loser' look on his face.

      Delete
    3. you're definitely an expert on "loser" with all your experience in the subject.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. Don't kill the messenger just because you don't like the message Bob.

      By the way, how's that hand? I just nipped it a little yesterday. Don't stick it near my jaws next time, or you might get 'really' bitten.

      Hee Hee....liberals, you gotta love 'em

      Delete
    7. Seriously. It'd be like if L'Osservatore Romano endorsed Nixon in '60.

      Delete
    8. So Bucky thinks he is Hermes now!! Ha!!

      Delete
    9. Liberals get nasty when they lose. In fact, they're nasty all of the time, but they get really nasty when their guy/gal is about to lose or loses.

      Arthur is probably mad because it looks like his book won't be able to end like he wanted.

      Hey, the way I look at it, he can always just write fiction, liberals do that all of the time when they are describing 'their' presidents.

      Delete
  4. Astro Alert, with no moon and clear skies predicted for the next week, the Orionid Metero showers should be spectacular, between the hours of 11pm and 5:30am.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Melody is a classic liberal. She wants to force her stupid ideas onto the rest of us.

    Why doesn't she move to Guyana, and form her own world, and leave the rest of us alone? The U.S. Constitution was not written to form a socialist society.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Boy, this Libya thing is really blowing up! It's going to be a good debate on Monday.

    I have a feeling Obama is going to take a real, verbal beating.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A bunch of journalists are saying the Obama Administration will pull an October surprise. Especially now that Obama appears to be losing.

      Hang on folks. Never underestimate a liberal Democrat's willingness to be devious, and sleazy, right before an election.

      Delete
    2. It will involve either Libya or Iran.....you betcha!

      Delete
    3. Here's the prelude.

      http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2012/10/20/white-house-prepared-to-meet-iran-nuclear/1646801/

      Wouldn't Ahmadinejad rather have a weak president, like Obama, than a strong one, like Romney?

      Delete