Friday, August 12, 2011

Winston-Salem Journal LTE's FR 08/12/11


Good AM, folks! The eagle-eyed folks at Media General entitled the LTE page as Saturday LTE's.

Unborn children have value
It is disheartening to me that our nation is increasingly becoming a society of self-centered people, and abortion is one of numerous manifestations of that selfishness.

A recent letter ("Guilty civil servants," Aug. 8) chastised state Rep. Dale Folwell and state Sen. Peter Brunstetter for allegedly telling "women what they can or cannot do with their own bodies." In contrast, I commend both men for the stand they have taken.

The writer of that letter, and many others with a similar point of view, apparently don't give much, if any, consideration to the fact that abortion involves not just a woman's body but also that of her unborn child, who is a living human being with the potential to make a major contribution to the world.

Either human life has value or it doesn't, regardless of what many people, or even a government, may believe. God is the ultimate judge, not us. The Bible indicates that human life begins at conception, not after birth or even in the second trimester. (Any logical person should realize that it is strictly an arbitrary decision to designate the beginning of the second trimester as the distinction between a fetus and a baby.)

There are reasons to believe that God loves each unborn child, so every time another is aborted, it must make God sad, and it should make us sad, also. And if God regards even unborn children as worthy of his love, we ought to treat all unborn children as having value.

HARVEY ARMOUR
Winston-Salem

Competition
Tate Reeves, the Republican nominee for lieutenant governor of Mississippi, said the following in his victory speech after a primary election earlier this month: "We have to make sure that we're providing access to a quality education for all of our people. Black, white, rich and poor. We have to improve the early education curriculum to get children off to the best start possible. We have to put college within reach of every kid who needs it."

Well put. I just hope that the next generation of North Carolinians is prepared to compete with those who will be graduating from schools in Mississippi.

KATHY LISLE
Winston-Salem

Debt and spending
America faces an epic debt problem; we spend far more than we earn. It's an addiction. America has produced a free-enterprise system that has benefited not only America but the world. Problem? We're broke. We have ideologies and social programs that exceed our capacity. We have weakened ourselves, financially, industrially and nationally. The debt approaches $15 trillion — about $130,000 per taxpayer. The recent debt crisis suggests major problems, unless we take action.

There are two strongly opposing positions. One holds that we must take the money we need from those who have the most — successful business owners, investors, "fat cats." Spread the wealth around. Attract intellectuals. Promote big government; depend on big government. Some suggest that that's the compassionate, wise position.

An opposing position is that we should equalize opportunity, not necessarily wealth; that penalizing (taxing) success discourages hard work and investment. Further, that when people reap the rewards of hard work and wise investment, they work and invest even more. More jobs are created, unemployment falls; that actually, it's the way of the greatest good for the greatest number.

Also there are opposing views on military spending. Is it wise; does it discourage those who wish us ill, or does it mostly waste resources?

Actually, having opposing positions is acceptable, even healthy — if we as citizens make a point of staying informed, staying involved and voting. Otherwise, we simply disagree, possibly harboring counterproductive ill feelings. We should remind ourselves of this as election year approaches.

JAMES LASSING
Winston-Salem

Far to the right
It seems, from the bills passed by both houses of our state government, that our once-proud state is now functioning far to the right of traditionally conservative states. Miserly spending on education and health, and restrictive social policies, put us below any of our neighbors to the south.
I suppose our new Republican leaders have a plan, but returning to the 19th century shouldn't be a part of it.

MARTHA KENNEDY
Winston-Salem

22 comments:

  1. JD read the LTE's in the "Journal's" Readers' Forum, and posted his reply both in the Forum, and on The Leopard's Limb page here. I am pasting that comment here:

    JDR said...
    For Today (Friday)

    Mr. LASSING is correct in that “The debt approaches $15 trillion “ - but use of the word “recent” in describing the debt crisis suggests lack of historical perspective … and his definition of “taxing” through the word “penalizing” is also distorted.

    While we [Americans] certainly need to encourage “hard work and investment”, and those that do should “reap the rewards”, let us be careful what all that means. Coal Mining and Suckering Tobacco both qualify as True Hard Work, but the rewards reaped are black lung and a bad-back. Investment in an enterprise which requires equipment or labor or both is different than shorting stock in a bear market.

    Missing in Mr. Lassings analysis is the simple detail that business owners directly lower their penalizing (taxes) through capital investment and expenses including labor. Also missing are the tax avoidance strategies of these “investors” - compensating themselves in stock or dividends, not to mention the company car – all of which are de facto wealth distribution... upwards …provided legally by the same “big government” for which he feigns resentment.

    August 12, 2011 6:08 AM

    ReplyDelete
  2. LTE1: Supporters of this policy also support limited government, a bit of a paradox. This law is political showboating, playing to the Republicans' base. It will accomplish nothing, and wasted time from real issues.

    LTE2: Mr. Reeves' statement is a fine example of campaign rhetoric, commendable as far as it goes. However, it doesn't go to the extent of explaining how those goals will be funded. Oh, those devils and details.

    LTE3: A thoughtful analysis that lacks a concluding analysis. We are encouraged to vote, but for what? The writer is correct in that having opposing positions can be healthy, if it leads to finding a workable middle ground. As for military spending being wise, is having a police force wise? Yes, but not if WS police are running to police Greensboro and High Point.

    LTE4: No, returning to the past isn't a good idea, and that past includes the policies and practices of the deposed Dem majority.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well there is JD! I haven't seen him since Moses was a teenager. Hope all is going ok.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stab....right back to you!

    ReplyDelete
  5. James Lassing...some thoughtful points but alas we may be over the edge. Our over leveraged-debt driven-economy was built on several simultaneous bubbles: real estate, stocks, consumer debt and over consumption. All four of these bubbles have burst since 2008 and 2009. Stock markets are only attractive temporarily since the Fed has been pumping ever more devalued dollars into our economy- QE-1 and QE-2. More nearly free money is trying to lure people and businesses to go into debt to grow the economy. Meantime, the people who have savings, mainly seniors, can get no return on savings. This is the age group that needs it the most. We are once again rewarding debt at the expense of thrift.

    By the way, there are two more bubbles to burst. The dollar bubble and the national debt bubble. The world is awash is nearly worthless dollar denominated assets and soon enough, the assets will have no value as the currency has no value. At that point, the national debt bubble bursts because there is nothing to pay it with and default results. Our dollar collapses and pulls the world economy down with it. Our tinkering with our tax code is meaningless. The kind of fiscal restraint needed to head off these events may be politically untenable, but not doing so will prove unforgivable.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Martha Kennedy doesn't have a clue of what is far right. She thinks anything short of full socialism is racist and right wing extremism.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Stab...I wouldn't look for your liberal friends to return to the forum anytime soon. It would take a true bonehead to defend Obama at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Life's too short to interact with the likes of you, Bucky or Lindsey or whatever the hell your name is.

    You have quite a way of winning friends and influencing people.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello Bucky and Arthur!

    Arthur, interact with the LTE's and the rest of us.

    Bucky, those in closer ideological alignment with President Obama probably find it easier to defend him.

    However, I note that there is some dissatisfaction with him on the part of some members of the left. There are mutterings about a Hillary Clinton primary challenge. I think that is a reflection on the sorry state of politics when Hillary is considered a suitable replacement.

    Presumably, wiser Dem heads will prevail, as a primary challenge to a sitting Prez probably will weaken that party's WH chances, no matter who wins the primary. OTOH, with some exceptions the current GOP slate of candidates constitutes something of a clown show. The R's may shoot themselves in the political foot with their eventual nominee, regardless of Dem internecine fighting.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Stab, hope all is well. Hi Arthur,WW, and the rest.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi Bob! I hope all is well with you. How are you and Doc Susskind (physicist) getting along?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Good afternoon folks!
    LTE 1: Theological and abortion arguments. The US has long been a society of self-centered people. As for the bill, it is a paternalistic and unnecessary govt intrusion into a private matter.
    LTE 2: Recent Journal articles have showcased the gains in graduation rates amongst county schools. Hope the progress that has been made doesn't evaporate over a single freakin' penny sales tax.
    LTE 3: Some talk radio points regurgitated. The US is NOT broke although some individuals are. The free-enterprise system is built on spending by consumers, B2B, exports and, yes, govt. If there's no spending, businesses can't make money and won't hire anyone. The two opposing views presented are actually pure capitalism vs. pure socialism and neither are plausible in practice. I would amend the last paragraph to say having viable opposing positions based on an understanding of how the economy works and the reality of the situation instead of blind acceptance of a favorite talking head's mutterings is healthy.
    LTE 4: We are about to join our southern brethren in 19th century style semi-theocracy. The most worrisome aspect is the impact on education which has a direct bearing on whether jobs come here or go elsewhere unlike the penny sales tax.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The 11th Circuit Court just declared the individual mandate part of the ACA unconstitutional.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Good news so far. There goes the funding mechanism of the whole scheme.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Stab....trust me....Hillary would be just as bad if not worse than Obama. I spent three days responding to one of her sexist and discriminatory suggestions several years ago.

    Obamacare is an Obamination. Let's hope the SCOTUS throws the whole thing out.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yep... hung drawn and quartered would be a good start.

    ReplyDelete
  17. A bill signed by a constitutional lawyer, Barack Obama, is declared uncontitutional. You gotta love it.

    I'll take the nitwit Sarah Palin over the 'scholar' Obama anyday.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If the press feels like they can ask Michele Bachmann about submission and the bible, then I've got a few questions for gay and lesbians when they run.

    ReplyDelete
  19. not only does the press feel like they can ask, they actually can.

    ReplyDelete