Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE TU 07/17/12



Remaining votes
Has it occurred to anyone that, aside from the questionable reasoning of Chief Justice John Roberts' deciding vote, of the remaining four votes to approve the constitutionality of Obamacare, three were the female justices (Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan)? Could there possibly be a "feminicity/compassionate" element in their rationale rather than "cold, hard, legal" judgment? (I don't know about Justice Stephen Breyer.)
Just wondering.

GORDON DOLIBER
Lewisville
Credit tactics
Regarding the economic-incentives editorial ("Two-thousand jobs worth a heavy pitch," July 12) and CFS II, do we really want to pay our money to a company whose contribution to our well-being is to buy charged-off debt for pennies on the dollar and then try to collect the full amount (plus interest and fees) using its own agents?
Doesn't "charged-off" mean written off and already taken as a loss on the creditor's tax return? If $600 or more, hasn't the creditor notified the IRS and the debtor of the write-off as income to the debtor (Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt)? Probably yes.
What tactics does CFS II use that the credit-card company did not already use?

LARRY B. COFFEY
Winston-Salem
For the common good
I was reared in an era when people were bound together by common circumstances and in a community where we looked after one another. If a neighbor was incapacitated, members of the community would mow his lawn and trim his hedges or harvest his hay before it was rendered useless by the elements. Without the benefit of a sophisticated knowledge of the U.S Constitution, we were still motivated to "promote the general welfare" by our acts of neighborly concern and understanding.
The phrase "for the common good" is a powerful concept that communicates the very best of human nature that knows consciously and unconsciously that we are all bound together by our need for community and mutual regard. With this phrase as a standard, I become very confused about the negative uproar over affordable health care. Those who find it so objectionable make no mention of the 30 million uninsured people in our nation. Our greatness as a nation is diminished every time a child does not receive the best possible treatment because of a pre-existing condition, when a person's insurance is canceled or a family must file for bankruptcy because of excessive medical expenses.
Remember that presidents since Theodore Roosevelt have been attempting to correct a less-than-desirable health-care system. What we have now is the most creative and courageous effort in over a century. With the political will and a concern for the common good, we can rectify any problematic features that exist with the present law.

CHARLES FRANCIS WILSON
Winston-Salem
Health-care problems
I believe something needs to be done about the cost of health care. I do applaud the efforts of this administration to fix it, even though I don't think this health-care bill is the answer. But neither side of the argument seems to understand the problem with this bill.
First, all employers that have a few more employees than the maximum number to be considered exempt will probably lay off those extra workers before this law goes into effect. Since 85 percent of employed adults work for a small company, this will cause a massive jump in unemployment. Small businesses that can't meet the exempt status will be faced with either providing health care or paying large fines, neither of which most of us can afford.
Second, it doesn't work long term to continue subsidizing people who can, but won't, work and carry their own weight. This bill requires everyone else to pay their costs, thereby making it another big government entitlement program.
But neither is it true, as some Republicans are saying, that this is the largest middle-class tax increase ever. This is a disingenuous argument. There is no tax increase if you have health insurance. My taxes won't go up, because I already pay my own way.
It has been reported that 40 percent of the cost of health care is due to unnecessary procedures done to minimize potential lawsuits. The real solution to out-of-control spiraling costs is to enact tort reform and stop the frivolous malpractice lawsuits.

DAVID F. MOSER
Winston-Salem

34 comments:

  1. LTE #1: A conspiracy theory.

    LTE #2: Let's play semantics for a moment. The word 'welfare' brings to mind a negative connotation of handouts and entitlements. Now let's change the word 'welfare' to 'incentive'...HMMMMM.

    LTE #3 & 4: Negativity began when the program became 'Obama'Care; it's never had a negative connotation when it was 'Romney'Care

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Romney is the lesser of two 'evils'. I've held my nose a lot of times when I've voted.

      This time, however, the stench is overwhelming from Obama. So my vote will be easy this time around.

      Delete
    2. Welfare should have a negative connotation. Doing nothing and receiving goods and services, is not motivational, breeds laziness, and it's not beneficial to the country as whole.

      Delete
    3. 'Romney Care' was a bad idea too. Those losers up in Massachusetts wanted it, so he gave it to them.

      However, a majority of citizens of the U.S. didn't want Obamacare. But Obama rammed it up everybody's yahzoooo. And it didn't feel good either!

      Delete
  2. Lte1...yes it is a "feminine/compassion" element in the court ruling. It's called Liberalism and that is the selling mechanism for generations--sounds caretaking on the way in but is a monster as it eventually collapses. That is what we are in the early stages of now. That which can't be sustained will not be. Justice Breyer is little more than a beta male in a robe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Credit tactics. Heavy handed tactics is more like it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. For the "Common good". If presidents since Teddy R have been trying, without success, to solve this problem, then after a century wouldn't it seem evident that the "solution" is not to be found in government?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Healthcare problems. This bill sets up trap doors that are to collapse the healthcare system until the ultimate "solution" is a last resort---single payer government controlled. Government is always the answer. About those lawyers....don't they dominate Washington anyway? Their meal ticket will not be taken away.

    ReplyDelete
  6. LTE #1 – One of the stupider LTEs in recent times.
    Maybe the women are just smarter than dunces like Thomas and Scalia.

    LTE #2 - A thoughtful letter, but off base here. CFS II is not your usual collection agency.

    It is a family business, started by folks who had been horribly treated by another collection agency. They take just the opposite approach, treating their own employees and the people they are trying to collect from in a dignified manner.

    They have also won one of the Better Business bureau’s highest awards…I wonder if any other collection agency has ever done that.

    2,000 jobs is a lot more than Caterpillar, and the pay is about the same.

    LTE #3 – I’m a little tired of all the whining about ACA. Americans should be ashamed of the fact that even though we pay way more for healthcare than any other nation, we are nowhere near the top in quality of healthcare received. And we should also be ashamed that despite the fact that we are the wealthiest nation in history, we have citizens who whine that we cannot afford to provide health care for all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I absolutely agree re: LTE 3. And I have no idea where Mr. Moser is getting his 40% stat. Tort reform's well and good, but from what I've read it would bring costs down by a few percentage points. If you really want to control costs, you need to bring more healthy people into the system, and move away from the fee for service model.

      Delete
    2. The ACA is not going to bring down the cost of healthcare, you liberal boob. They are going to go UP!

      Delete
    3. I believe RomneyCare has been able to stabilize cost in Massachusetts. They still have problems with the non insured from other states using their emergency departments.

      Delete
    4. How does the ACA address the problem of thousands of illegal immigrants flooding across our borders and obtaining free healthcare at emergency rooms, Wordly?

      Delete
    5. Which is the point of ACA...one state cannot do it alone.

      Those who continue to bellyache about ACA don't really know what they are talking about...if they have health insurance themselves, they are already paying for those emergency room visits through higher insurance rates.

      If they don't, then we are paying for them.

      Delete
    6. And it won't go away because of the ACA either.

      While Obama and his 'justice' department are suing states for 'trying' to help the federal government with illegal immigration issues, millions of dollars worth of medical expenses are being passed on to the taxpayers.

      Thanks Obama. What have you done 'TO' us lately?

      Delete
  7. Navy's new gender-neutral carriers won't have urinals

    http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/11/navys-new-gender-neutral-carriers-wont-have-urinals/?iref=allsearch
    ________

    Oh goodie, change everything for the few women on board, but let the homosexuals still 'leer' at heterosexuals while they shower and use bathrooms.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dunce, you are a truly sick fuck. Why don't you go jump off a bridge and put yourself and the rest of us out of your misery?

      Delete
  8. Mr. Doliber:

    Females want to be independent and self reliant, or so the story goes, but they want to be able to get on the government dole as quick as possible if anything happens to their man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's their man that impregnated them in the first place and made the child(ren) that need to be fed.

      Delete
    2. Has anybody besides me noticed how women want equal pay for equal work, yet they are glad to stand around while the man digs the ditch?

      Delete
  9. Good afternoon folks!
    LTE 1: I'm wondering why this LTE was even submitted. 5 justices approved it. That's all that matters.
    LTE 2: Debt collection agencies have earned a reputation for sleaze. They are often the focus of some tv investigation piece of illegal practices. With an avg salary for the new jobs being in the $40k range and the company working with the local govt to locate here, it seems to me the company is legit and does follow the guidelines. I do not think a sleazeball operation would have grown so large without having its deceitful practices exposed.
    LTE 3: Some like to think of America past as a time of rugged individuals who did everything on their own with help from no one, but that was never the case. The US pays by far the most for its health care and lists medical costs as its number one reason for bankruptcy, so the existing model was clearly no longer working as efficiently as it should.
    LTE 4: While there may be a few firms who cut employees to get below the limit, I'm not buying the scenario of massive layoffs. I don't see the costs of either paying the extra for health care or dropping it and paying the fine out weighing the costs associated with dropping employees, especially if a firm is growing. Paying the fine will most likely be cheaper than providing the health benefit which may result in smaller firms taking the fine option, but I don't see them laying off employees. Why would a businessman limit growth when there are additional profits to be made?
    Those with insurance are already paying for those without insurance, so Mr. Moser's subsidy fears are essentially a wash.
    I'd like to see the source of Mr. Moser's 40% figure. I wonder how much of the extraneous tests are CYA vs. add more profit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LTE #1 was submitted for the same reason that Dunce types his endless stream of meaningless vitriol and bigotry, to get the attention that mommy never gave him.

      Delete
    2. I think you've done a fine job of demonstrating who is the bigot in here. You, and your liberal friends, preach tolerance, but you all are the biggest bigots in the room.

      Hate speech, name calling, curse words, you name it, you've done it.

      Delete
    3. Fine words from the queen of hate.

      Keep spewing out your filth sugar pie honey bunch.

      Delete
  10. Mr. Moser is also way out in left field when he talks about the effect of ACA on small businesses.

    84.1% of all businesses in the US are already qualified for the tax incentives included in ACA. That incentive offers, right now, a 35% tax credit for money spent on health insurance for employees. That is not a tax write off, but a credit, to be deducted from your federal taxes at the end of your fiscal year.

    About 300,000 smart businesses took advantage of that incentive last year, only 10% of those eligible. I guess the rest were too busy listening to the Chicken Little crowd and planning their bankruptcies to see the opportunity. It is no wonder that 4 out of 5 startups go belly up within 5 years.

    In 2014, the incentive will rise to 50%. Those of us who were already providing our employees with quality insurance stand to benefit the most, as we should. As I've said before, any business that says it cannot provide its employees with reasonable benefits has no business being in business.

    ReplyDelete
  11. After review, Boy Scouts reaffirm ban on gays

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/07/17/apnewsbreak-boy-scouts-reaffirm-ban-on-gays/#ixzz20usqs9Eu

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Immigration Laws? We don't got no stinking immigration laws!

    We kinda knew that Obama.
    __________

    Opponents of the uphelded portion of Arizona's immigration law make a move:

    Even if opponents don't succeed in getting the requirement put on hold, some backers of the law are questioning the level of cooperation they will get from federal immigration authorities, who will be called to verify people's immigration status and be responsible for picking up illegal immigrants from local officers.

    Federal immigration officers have said they will help, but only if doing so conforms to their priorities, including catching repeat violators and identifying and removing those who threaten public safety and national security

    ReplyDelete