Sum It Up
The Sum It Up question from Sunday was: Do you think public-school students should be able to opt out of saying the Pledge of Allegiance even if their families have no religious objection to it?
The issue about the current pledge policy is that it is in violation of both state and federal laws. The proposed change is not to discourage participation but to allow students to opt out, quietly and respectfully, if they do not want to recite the pledge for reasons of their own, while continuing to have a time for reciting the pledge every morning.
Real patriotism does not need to be forced! We are patriots because we love this country and believe in its shared principals, not because we are forced into compliance.
ELISABETH M. MOTSINGER
The writer is a member of the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County school board.
— the editor
The flag of our United States of America is an honored symbol of the freedoms that were fought for and won. I think opting out of the Pledge of Allegiance is not an option, especially in a free educational system of learning.
LOUIS JONES
No. It should be a daily lesson of the national unity required to maintain our republic form of government, providing we the people with supreme control over government. Only as an informed public, active in the process of selecting those who govern, can we assure individual freedom and universal opportunity, with liberty and justice for all.
JIM WHEELER
Maybe a better question: Could disagreements surrounding enforcement lead to potential lawsuits (i.e. ACLU), pushing an already over-burdened educational system into numerous and costly litigations (think class action)?
SARAH MERRITT
If a child refuses to stand for the pledge, ask him to leave and mandate his parents pay for education at an institution of their choice, consider moving or standing in honor of all Americans who believe that we live in the greatest country to date on this earth and we need to preserve the tradition of standing during the pledge.
ROBERT MISIEWICZ
Whether to allow students to opt out of saying the Pledge of Allegiance is a sensitive question. Many will be offended that a student might choose not to participate. Yet requiring a student to say the pledge is an undeniable restriction on the liberty mentioned in the pledge.
I like the pledge and have always participated when it is said, albeit sometimes awkwardly. What I like best is the part about liberty and justice for all. I like the flag, too. But I can see how some very patriotic students might question parts of the pledge, namely the "under God" and the excessive emphasis on the flag parts. Some might question whether we have adequately addressed issues of liberty and justice. Students, teachers and others could use this issue to discuss in some depth what patriotism is all about.
EVERETTE HARTZOG
Absolutely not. If you can't pledge allegiance to this great country you live in, then pledge yourself to an airport and get the hell out of here.
STEVE SHORE
When the teacher says stand for the Pledge of Allegiance, then every student who does not stand should be escorted to the principal's office. Whether he or she says the Pledge of Allegiance is up to the student. Bottom Line: The teacher should be in control of her classroom, not the students. Teachers usually get as much respect as they demand.
NAOMI J. DAVIS
Why all the fuss over the Pledge of Allegiance in schools? I am 70 years old, and I remember when I was in elementary school there were several students whose faith prevented them from reciting the pledge, so they stood when we did, but they neither placed their hand over their heart nor recited the pledge. They stood while we did as a courtesy to the rest of us.
There is no one forcing these protesters to recite the pledge. How difficult would it be for them to stand quietly during the pledge just to be polite? All they want is to remain slouched in their seats and probably texting. The problem is that the simple acts of courtesy and respect for others have all but disappeared from our society, and that is the shame of it.
LINDA DIORIO
Public school students should be required to say the Pledge of Allegiance every day. It appears that we want our children to grow up not believing in God, their country or themselves. Do we want robots or do we want adults with convictions and strong beliefs?
KAY ANDERSON
Small or even older children in school cannot really give their consent and don't even understand the pledge they are reciting. On these grounds alone, they should not be required to say the pledge.
Also, in a democratic republic, built on freedom of dissent, the government (schools, whatever) should not require its citizens to pledge allegiance to it. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects one's right to "refrain from speaking" the pledge or standing (also a form of speech). This has been the conclusion in two court cases: 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Holloman v. Harland, 2004; U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Lane v. Owens, 2003. Sorry, guys, it's already been settled.
KAM BENFIELD
No! The Pledge of Allegiance has nothing to do with religion. It is pledging loyalty to this country. If people can't do that, why are they here? My mother was a legal immigrant who loved this country and became a proud American. Pledging allegiance wouldn't even have been a choice for her. It was a given and she was happy to say it.
This type of loyalty is being eroded by the politically correct crowd who don't have strong principles and whose only allegiance is to themselves. To paraphrase: "If you don't stand for something, you stand for nothing."
CHRISTINE PULISELIC
Is saying the Pledge of Allegiance the only means to instill patriotism in students? Or is the ritual of saying the Pledge of Allegiance more important than anything else?
BOON T. LEE
The Pledge of Allegiance is recited at the beginning of daily sessions of Congress — following an opening prayer, no less. Many Americans agree that such practices are good for our children. Yet increasingly, public-school curricula and policies are deconstructing and effacing America's traditions, values and history.
Someday, I dare say, progressives hope even to expunge prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance from Congress itself. That's part of what they call "fundamentally transforming the United States of America."
DEBORAH S. "DEB" PHILLIPS
Students should be able, for any reason, to opt out of saying the Pledge of Allegiance. No one should be made to pledge allegiance to a piece of cloth, no matter what it stands for. A country that invades another country at the whim of a few crazed warmongers should instill shame in its citizens, not allegiance.
And shame on the Journal for its editorial support for saying the pledge in the belief that it instills patriotism in the students. Patriotism has many detractors. George Bernard Shaw said, "Patriotism is the conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it."
ANNE PAISLEY
Congress officially recognized the Pledge of Allegiance in 1942, but in 1943, the Supreme Court ruled that public school students could not be forced to recite it.
ReplyDeleteSo Congress has only been saying the pledge daily for 69 years out of how many and only 57 of those years have been "under god."
I find it fascinating that some of the same people who decry states rights and say the federal government can do no right, want everyone to pledge allegiance to the federal flag.
Forced speech is not free speech.
Why can't students stand quietly with the other students if they don't want to recite the pledge? What do teachers do now if a student doesn't say the pledge? Do they start choking the student(s) who doesn't say the pledge? Hardly.......!
ReplyDeleteThis is all part of the radical, left-wing Democrats' plan to 'fundatmentally change America as we know it' into just another loser country with no morals and no respect for anything.
Who have we got in the comments section? Naomi, Boon T., Deb Phillips, Diorio, and Hartzog. It's the who's who of the monthly LTE club. It's too bad the Journal doesn't make a policy that you can only write in once a year. But, then, it probably wouldn't have enough letters to publish I guess.
After all, the Journal is pretty much useless as an objective and informative news source.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhat a surprise!
ReplyDeleteAG Eric Holder is playing the race card. It's the get out of trouble one. You know, when you're black, if you get into trouble, you just say everybody is going after me because I'm black.
Another twist to the Holder and Obama Justice Department is that the head of the Civil Rights Division is Hispanic, and guess what he's doing? He's suing states over their illegal immigration laws that are designed to assist the federal government. What a coincidence?
Never mind the 'Fast and Furious' investigation, where Holder allowed thousands of guns to be shipped to Mexico. Yeah...yeah..I know, he says he didn't know. But we all know that's a lie.
So instead of just packing his bags and calling it quits...Holder pulls out the race card.
What a surprise!
Students can stand or sit during the pledge and cannot be sent out of the room for not participating. Only in private schools can a student be forced to recite the pledge or forced to stand or be removed from the room.
ReplyDeleteBanks v. Board of Public Instruction, Lipp v. Morris, Goetz v Ansell, Sheldon v. Fannin.
ReplyDeleteCan you imagine telling Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, George Mason, or Samuel Bryan that they would have to pledge allegiance to a federal flag?
ReplyDeleteNBC's Brian Williams stunned his viewing audience last night when he declared the change in policy to allow gays to serve openly in the U.S. Military a success.
ReplyDeleteWhile Williams was pontificating about how wonderful the change was, Breanna Manning, I mean, Bradley Manning was going on trial for his role in one the United States' biggest national security violation in history.
If you haven't heard, Bradley Manning, a gay U.S. soldier, leaked thousands of 'Top Secret' documents during the Wikileaks Scandal. He is currently undergoing trial for his role in the leaks. His 'gayness' has become an issue because now there is some question to if some type of harassment caused him to leak the files.
Gender identification and psychological issues have also arisen.
These attachments deal with homosexual health, as well as, gender identification issues relating to Manning's trial:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bradley-manning-defense-focuses-female-alter-ego-erratic/story?id=15207261
http://www.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147515106
I certainly remember saying the pledge of allegiance as a kid in school. I don't recall ever being taught it was written by a a socialist, Francis Bellamy, though.
ReplyDeleteHe's freakin' awesome! He talks about sex all the time because he's a sex therapist, but he really is a great teacher!
ReplyDeleteI'll check him out Bobby.
ReplyDeleteYou should check out that second attachment. I'm pretty well-read, but it has some stuff in it that I hadn't heard.
ReplyDeleteBobby...we were worried about communism back in the dark ages. It's only more recently, when Obama came to power, that we began to worry about socialism.
ReplyDeleteThe original pledge was written by Bellamy as a marketing promotion for a magazine, The Youth's Companion
ReplyDeleteA marketing promotion that turns into a pledge? Go figure!!!
ReplyDelete. . . and there's actually some people that insist we recite a marketing promotion to an object every morning?
ReplyDelete. . . in CONGRESS?
ReplyDeletefrom a historical perspective, there was no officially sanctioned pledge of allegiance until June of 1942, 7 months after Pearl Harbor.
ReplyDelete6 months
ReplyDelete. . . and so they said 'Don't Mess With Texas' worked for Texas, let's pledge our allegiance to the flag. That'll teach them to mess with the U.S.!
ReplyDeleteAs usual, you-know-who cannot get much of anything right. Today's postings are not "letters to the editor". They are responses to the "Sum It Up" feature, so have nothing to do with the LTE rules.
ReplyDeleteA couple of days ago, he posted an erroneous comment about Don Witte, who is NOT retired (he owns a company in which he is still quite active) and who is only an adjunct (that means part time) at Forsyth Tech. Forsyth Tech, like most community colleges, has more adjuncts than full time employees.
And then there was his claim that he speaks Spanish and hangs out with Latinos which is an obvious lie in light of his comment that "que tal" is not commonly used. Having spent a great deal of time in Mexico and Central America and having a number of friends from South America, I hear "que tal" used about as often as the American term "really".
Remember Mr. Bluster? A perfect fit.
"and there's actually some people that insist we recite a marketing promotion to an object every morning? "
ReplyDeleteShocking, ain't it? God bless America.
Rush....where have you been, you coward? I'm waiting for your name and address. If you don't give it up, I'll bet your friend 'LaSombra' will.
ReplyDeleteGreat deal of time? What, two weeks?
I think I've got you figured out: You're a drag queen that likes to drink and do drugs.
P.S. I'll bet you know a lot about Forsyth Tech, since you graduated from law school there.
ReplyDeleteFunny how you, and your little stooge Rielle appear together today.
ReplyDeleteSorry, you two liberals can 'hate' me all you want. I'll be right here.
ReplyDeleteThe Pledge. I pledged 4 years ago that I would never enter a shopping mall again. Well...I broke it today and will do it again after while. I entered on purpose and by myself. No one else to blame.
ReplyDeleteI guess poor 'Wordly' is afraid to post anything in here now. She's probably afraid her name will appear on the World Wide Web if she does. Who could blame her after 'LaSombra's' recent behavior.
ReplyDeleteWW....that would be a hard pledge to keep, expecially here. Most all the stores are there.
ReplyDeleteYou probably pledged that you wouldn't spend a lot money either. I'll bet that one went out the door too.
'Ol Sheriff Joe Arpaio is not happy. The Obama Justice Department jerked his ability to make inquiry into the immigration status of arrested persons. Reportedly, the Justice Department plans to supply 'ol Joe with immigration officials to check the immigration status of people arrested. We'll have to wait and see if that happens. If not, thousands of illegals will be let go into populace to commit other crimes.
ReplyDeleteNo big deal, right? We've only got about 18 million of them already.
Dearest Bucky,
ReplyDeleteI'm soon going to be invaded for the next four days. I have to prepare for battle.(I mean Christmas celebrations) although I feel the former may better describe it at this point.
I did contemplate remarking on your better behavior this morning, but you seem to be headed downhill this afternoon.
WW, just left the mall myself. Not too bad. Hope I don't have to go back until next year.
Wordly, good to hear from you. I thought that mean old, liberal LaSombra had scared you away.
ReplyDeleteI hope you enjoyed my fact based comments that I made earlier the morning. I make my posts merely to inform people about different issues. Unfortunately, there are those on the left who try to hide certain facts in order to cast a more favorable light on some situations.
The truth may not always be pretty, but it's always the truth.
Good afternoon folks!
ReplyDeleteSum it up: "Real patriotism does not need to be forced! We are patriots because we love this country and believe in its shared principals, not because we are forced into compliance." -this is one of my favorite LTE forum lines of the year. I also like Ms. Paisley's GBS quote of what patriotism too often has come to mean as demonstrated by several of the SIU comments. Of course, as the very knowledgeable Mr. Benfield notes, the SC has already said you can't force students to say it. Whether or not one says the pledge doesn't have squat to do with one's loyalty to the country.
Here's a video of liberal Supreme Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor saying that judges are not suppose to make policy.
ReplyDeleteIt's clear that many liberal judges are doing just that. And people wonder why the country is headed in the wrong direction.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfC99LrrM2Q
Think gays just sit around drinking tea. Think again.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/adam_lambert_and_boyfriend_arrested_rZuUhCZjCSuUf1p1vfegmJ?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME=
Former Representative Anthony WEINER (D), and his wife Huma, had a little Weiner on December 21st. How you would like to be that poor kid?
ReplyDeleteA federal judge, appointed by Obama, rules in favor of a Obama Justice Department's motion to stop a S.C. immigration law. Wow Wee! That was a surprise!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/22/judge-strikes-key-provisions-south-carolina-immigration-law/
And who says justice is blind?
Think liberal Democrats can't be discriminatory? Think again. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor tried to discriminate against WHITE firefighters as an appellate judge. Who overruled her decision-the Supreme Court.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=u0hccf-F68Y&NR=1
Better to be the child of bright, successful people like the Weiners than to be the child of a lying, sick, homophobic, racist, misogynist fool.
ReplyDeleteAny credibility that you, and your bag lady Rielle, had is pretty much gone Rush. Maybe you should join a 'Liberals are us' blog.
ReplyDelete@Bob & WW: This guy might be able to give you more info on that knife you were talking about yesterday. He's local, has a phone number and address listed if you want to talk to him.
ReplyDeleteThanks LaSombra
ReplyDeleteSorry for the broken link.
ReplyDeletethanks again
ReplyDeleteTim Britton is a throwback to the great tradition of craftsmanship established in the mid 18th century by the Moravian founders of what is now Forsyth County. Nothing but quality.
ReplyDeleteLet's hope that he has no connection to LindsayGraham/Knothead/Bucky, etc.
AH, my 8:14 was a quote about Dr. Tim.
ReplyDelete