Sunday, September 30, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE SU 09/30/12


Blue-ribbon panel
North Carolina has seen the first payment to Art Pope for his purchase of the 2010 election. He has been appointed to the blue-ribbon panel to develop a five-year academic priorities and spending plan for the 16 campuses of the university system (“Panel to develop priorities for UNC system,” Sept. 14).
Panel members include the leaders of the General Assembly and the president of the N.C. Chamber of Commerce. The committee reminds me of the phrase, “a fox in the hen house.”
Art Pope doesn't like public education. He doesn't want an educated population that would demand higher wages.
If this panel follows Art Pope's lead, they should add changing the constitution of N.C. to their duties. Our constitution states that North Carolina “shall maintain a public system of higher education extended to the people of the state free of expense” where possible. Our system of higher education is under attack from the far-right wing of the Republican Party.Bridling this panel will be determined by a watchful and vigilant public and press.
Elections have consequences, and we have seen the destruction the 2010 election has had on public education. This panel could proceed with more disaster to higher education. We have seen that nothing will stand in the way of their agenda — and public education at all levels is under attack.
Campaign money will always demand payback. The citizens of North Carolina must consider carefully if we want to move forward or be subservient to a wealthy ruling class.
NANCY WRIGHT
Lexington
A shocking imperative
The headline article “City’s poverty rate rises to 24%” (Sept. 20) is indeed shocking. I would have guessed a much lower number. But the article does not state what dollar amount per person is the poverty level, but only mentions the median household income level of $37,501. It may be even more shocking to find that the 2011 federal “poverty threshold” is:
$11,702 for a single person under 65
$22,811 for a family of four (with two children)
I think these numbers give an even more shocking imperative to the extreme divergence of wealth in our country, and why the safety nets of unemployment, food stamps and welfare are necessary.
Our nation is becoming more divided than at any time since the Civil War. I am sorely afraid that a country with this division of wealth cannot exist much longer. We who are fortunate should vote with our hearts, and not with our wallets.
DAVID TURCK
Clemmons
Sum It Up
What will Gov. Bev Perdue's legacy be?

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE SA 09/29/12


Proud of their accomplishments
The Republican presidential campaign has railed against the alleged failures of the Obama administration. Amazingly, it has offered not a single word of contrast to the presumed triumphs of the last Republican administration. The most recent Republican president, George W. Bush, didn't even attend the Republican National Convention.
Is the GOP embarrassed that Bush turned a huge government surplus into a massive deficit, in part with tax cuts that primarily benefited the rich? Does it not want to call attention to his pushing our nation into a costly and futile war with false assertions that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction?
Are Republicans not proud of the deregulation that allowed our largest financial institutions to place risky bets on credit-default swaps and scam investors in mortgage-backed securities, bringing the world economy to the brink of meltdown? Are they afraid we'll remember that the Bush administration presided over the loss of millions of jobs, making President Obama's job-creation record look stellar?
Republicans can ignore history, but they can't delete it. They have a record. They are running from it, not on it.
Why? Is it because Republicans don't want voters to realize that Mitt Romney's campaign pledges of deregulation and tax cuts for millionaires echo eerily the promises George W. Bush made before the Supreme Court appointed him president?
LARRY ROTH
Germanton
Perspective and vision
The responsibilities of the Forsyth Board of Commissioners are formidable, and decisions made by the board have a bearing on the quality of life for all the citizens of the county. The wide range of responsibilities includes governance of public and mental-health services, public schools, social services, county tax rates and public safety. Perhaps the most important function of the board is the drafting of the annual county budget that determines how we spend our tax revenues.
In the past months the board has squandered so much time and energy on issues that have been, at best, distractions from its primary function. Sectarian prayer, guns in public parks and a resolution supporting voter-identification legislation had little to do with the authorized duties of our elected officials.
It is now time for a fresh perspective on the proper role of county government and a renewed vision for the future.
Gail McNeill, candidate in District B, will provide that perspective and vision. After Gail McNeill completed her graduate degree at the University of North Carolina, she continued her studies as a Fulbright Scholar. She has taught at Wake Forest University, the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Forsyth Technical Community College and in the public schools.
For the past 35 years Gail has been active in Forsyth County political and community affairs. She knows the county well and has a significant investment in the future of our community. Remember Gail McNeil on Nov. 6 for Forsyth County Commissioner.
PATRICIA SISSON
Winston Salem
Raising awareness
I so appreciated the article regarding Dr. Gene Paschold's efforts to raise awareness about the importance of colon cancer screening (“Doctor (now) practices what he preaches,” Sept. 21). As a survivor of colon cancer, there is no doubt in my mind that the routine colonoscopy allowed for early detection of the disease and saved my life.
LENORE SHAMEY
Winston-Salem
Finish the Thought
Briefly complete the sentence below and sent it to us at letters@wsjournal.com. We’ll print some of the results in a few days. Only signed entries, please — no anonymous ones.
“Debates between presidential candidates can help voters if they ...”

Friday, September 28, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE FR 09/28/12


Correcting a mistake
On Nov. 6, the voters of Forsyth County will have an opportunity to correct a big mistake.
In 2008, Karen Gordon, the Forsyth County Registrar of Deeds, was swept out of office by the “wave” that swept President Obama into office. Karen began working in the register of deeds office at a young age and was an exceptional employee for over 27 years. She was appointed registrar when her predecessor retired and served in that position for two years prior to the General Election in 2008, earning the respect and confidence of all who dealt with that office because of her efficiency, dependability and integrity. Then the election results robbed her of her job and her career.
Karen is running for register of deeds and I urge the people of Forsyth County to take advantage of an opportunity to correct a mistake and return Karen to office!
GLENDA MOTT
Kernersville
Can’t stop there
For those of us who are voting to re-elect President Obama — we can’t stop there. If we don't give him the House of Representatives and the Senate, he will be in the same position that he has been in for the past three years, fighting Republican obstructionism.
He can do a limited amount without the cooperation of Congress, but to do the really big things that this country needs, he needs the cooperation of Congress.
The wisest voter — in this election — will vote for the whole Democratic ticket.
CATHERINE W. PITTS
Winston-Salem
Sum It Up
The Sum It Up question from Sunday was: Do you trust political polls?

Well, a poll released by the right-wing Civitas Institute shows President Barack Obama ahead of Mitt Romney — I guess I can trust that one.
JANE FREEMONT GIBSON
 Yes, I trust political polls.
People who design the national polls have a good understanding of demographics and are trained to interpret the results.
SAM JONES
 Polling is subjective and skewed, regardless of the polling source. Do I “trust political polls?” Are you kidding? Trust is earned. News organizations have proven themselves to be completely untrustworthy for decades. The major news networks are so in the tank for Democrats, it's comedy hour when they're on. It's now so common, there's rarely any attempt to hide the bias any longer.
Do I trust them? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice ... well, it ain't gonna happen.
WES PATTERSON
 Polls do inform a general trend of public opinion but they may not reflect 100 percent what exactly each person polled is thinking. Viewing in this perspective, yes, political polls are believable.
BOON T. LEE
 No, not at all. I really don't consider them very accurate.
WILLIAM SAMS
 I tend to dismiss most of the political polls, because they're oversampling Democrats. Similarly, I tend to dismiss the political news reports and editorials with misleading headlines, faulty premises, omitted or inaccurate facts or buried leads.
DEB PHILLIPS
 No, unless it’s a Rasmussen poll. The rest are all weighted 13-15 points in favor of Democrats.
DON WOLFE
 Trust polls? Are you kidding me? I don't think the pollsters manipulate the responses, but they do manipulate the outcomes by the questions they ask, how they phrase them and who they poll. Plus people being polled lie. I for one have been a white male in my 60s, a black female in my 20s, a black male in my 40s and a white female, no age given. Then I answered in line with my demographic, or not.
The hard core will support its candidate, regardless of anything else, so the 20 percent or so of true independents will decide who wins in the only poll that actually means anything, the election.
KEN HOGLUND

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE TH 09/27/12


Proud of their accomplishments
The Republican presidential campaign has railed against the alleged failures of the Obama administration. Amazingly, it has offered not a single word of contrast to the presumed triumphs of the last Republican administration. The most recent Republican president, George W. Bush, didn't even attend the Republican National Convention.
Is the GOP embarrassed that Bush turned a huge government surplus into a massive deficit, in part with tax cuts that primarily benefited the rich? Does it not want to call attention to his pushing our nation into a costly and futile war with false assertions that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction?
Are Republicans not proud of the deregulation that allowed our largest financial institutions to place risky bets on credit-default swaps and scam investors in mortgage-backed securities, bringing the world economy to the brink of meltdown? Are they afraid we'll remember that the Bush administration presided over the loss of millions of jobs, making President Obama's job-creation record look stellar?
Republicans can ignore history, but they can't delete it. They have a record. They are running from it, not on it.
Why? Is it because Republicans don't want voters to realize that Mitt Romney's campaign pledges of deregulation and tax cuts for millionaires echo eerily the promises George W. Bush made before the Supreme Court appointed him president?
LARRY ROTH
Germanton
Reconsider
Those of us who have been voting Democratic to emulate our grandfathers should seriously reconsider. No longer the party of John Kennedy and Harry Truman, it has become a breeding ground for socialists.
The Democrats, if given the chance, will lead us to the very kind of dependency that has emasculated Greece and Spain and bankrupted southern Europe.
RICHARD MERLO
Elkin
Finish the Thought
Saturday, we asked readers to complete the sentence: “The 2012 presidential election will come down to ...”
“... the trust-worthiness of the candidates. Do we want to put the ship of state in the hands of a man who appears to be lacking in conviction, principles and the moral courage to say what he truly believes? He is reluctant to articulate his tax, economic, health and social policies in unambiguous terms and he is unwilling to fully disclose his multi-years tax returns.
“The person I am referring to obviously is former Gov. Mitt Romney. The other candidate is President Obama, whose record is an open book. Now, you judge.”
BOON T. LEE
“… whoever runs the most effective campaign. It seems like no matter who I vote for, things stay the same.”
WILLIAM SAMS
“… the Republican voter suppression attempts failing miserably.”
RUDY DIAMOND
“… Nov. 6, finally.”
JERE DAILEY
“… the economy. The dreadful state of our economy will be the determining factor in the election.
“With unemployment at over 8 percent, an increase in food prices of 20 percent, energy prices skyrocketing, family net worth crashing by 40 percent and debt that has us hanging on a fiscal cliff to national insolvency, people will ultimately vote with what's left of their pocketbooks. If they don't, they will feel the pain of voting for Obama quickly, especially when ‘Taxmageddon’ hits in January.”
ASTRID TODD
“… whether or not America wants a third term of Jimmy Carter. Warning: The Nobel Peace Prize committee is running out of awards to hand out. That's probably a good thing ...”
WES PATTERSON
“… an October surprise with superPAC attack ads. Will voters recognize the hands of anonymous donors who oppose environmental protection? Will voters be influenced by those who say ‘Trust me; we don't need regulations to protect pensions and investors’?”
CHARLES E. WILSON
“… whoever tells the most believable lies.”
MONA POTTS
“… whether voter choose to continue down the path we have been going the past four years or we choose a different path, quite simply.”
FRANK SCISM
“… the 52 percenters who truly love and respect America and continue to do what's right. Since we now know that the 1 percenters are robbing America with greed and the 47 percenters are doing nothing but using America. Thank God for our wonderful democracy. The majority wins, I hope.”
AUGUSTUS E. DARK

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE WE 09/26/12


A unique leader
We have invested 40 years on UNC Chapel Hill’s Board of Trustees, including a decade as chairs, with three different chancellors.
Chancellor Holden Thorp is a principled, caring and dedicated individual who can be a once-in-a-generation leader. When selected, we knew his experience had not fully prepared him for the job, but that he would grow into it. His superior intellect and leadership qualities have benefited UNC in countless ways, including a top 10 research funding ranking and $330 million in fundraising commitments last year. He launched a visioning process to maximize the relevance of the university in the 21st century.
History is full of examples of people who faced adversity early in their careers, learned lessons and became visionary leaders. Steve Jobs, Nelson Mandela and Margaret Thatcher are a few.
But under the 24-hour news cycle and social media, it is difficult for new leaders to develop. Every decision is questioned, and there is a standard that few, if any, can meet. This overzealous scrutiny discourages those with potential from serving in public roles.
Holden’s resignation was a serious setback. Holden is a unique leader with the vision and knowhow to move UNC toward its full potential. One can argue that he was slightly ahead of his time, but if that is true, then we have all failed to help build his potential. The university and the state are the real losers. We hope that at some point, Holden will reconsider his decision.
TIM BURNETT
FORMER CHAIR, UNC-CHAPEL HILL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, 2001-2003
Greensboro
NELSON SCHWAB
FORMER CHAIR, UNC-CHAPEL HILL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, 2005-2007
Charlotte
This letter was signed by three other former chairs — the editor.
Blaming the poor
Considering Mitt Romney's recent remarks, his refusal to release his tax returns and how fast and far the one-percenters are pulling away from the rest of us, this quote by author Norman Mailer (1923-2007) seems right on:
“To blame the poor for subsisting on welfare has no justice unless we are also willing to judge every rich member of society by how productive he or she is. Taken individual by individual, it is likely that there's more idleness and abuse of government favors among the economically privileged than among the ranks of the disadvantaged.”
DAVID HATCHER
Winston-Salem
Takers and makers
Do today’s Republicans really believe that 47 percent of Americans are “takers,” living off money confiscated from the “makers”?
When was the last time a prominent Republican leader made a point of praising hard-working, ordinary American families as opposed to “job creators”?
On Labor Day, House majority leader Eric Cantor (Republican) tweeted: “Today, we celebrate those who have taken a risk, worked hard, built a business and earned their own success.”
Even on Labor Day, he couldn’t praise American workers?
CNN’s John King recently shared a bit of his personal life when he said, “As a kid, my family was on food stamps for a few years when my dad got sick. We didn’t feel entitled and we weren’t victims and my father was actually pretty embarrassed about the whole thing. But in the end my mother was grateful that she was able to feed her kids.”
This strikes me as a more likely view of the majority of people who have to accept government aid than the view that the Romney campaign touts about laziness and “entitlement.”
All Republicans do these days is complain about the way things are going in America. They can’t say one kind — or honest, it seems — word about the American president or the American people or the American government.
When Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador in Libya, was killed, Mitt Romney’s first instinct was not to express sympathy, but to criticize the president.
Why do Republicans hate America so much?
TOMMY H. SIMMONS
Winston-Salem
I'm confused
It just occurred to me with all the fuss the biased media is making over Mitt Romney's wealth, I do not remember hearing anything about John Kennedy's fortune, or for that matter John Kerry’s. I'm not sure if Kennedy or Kerry gave anything to charity, but it probably doesn't come anywhere near what Romney has given.
Oh, I get it. Romney is Republican, Kennedy and Kerry are Democrats. Romney worked for his money, Kennedy inherited his and Kerry married his. Never mind, the liberals will only say, “So what?”
A quote from Mark Twain: “if you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed, if you read the newspaper, you're misinformed.”
MARION HODGES
Clemmons
Bring the troops home
Shortly after the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks in 2001, we sent our military forces into Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban and remove all support for al-Qaida. We remain there yet today, with a strategy that has failed.
The stated goal of the Obama administration is train the Afghan forces to be able to provide their own security. We have recently had to terminate joint patrols and embedding of our troops with Afghan units because of attacks on our people by Afghans they are working and living with.
We continue to have our brave young people killed and maimed by the Taliban and other Afghan attackers and will do so until we finally leave there.
I now firmly believe it is time to pull the troops out immediately. Fold our tents, pull up the stakes, pack our bags and bring the troops home.
I find it intolerable to lose yet one more American life in this hopeless war. There is no possible benefit that would accrue to our staying one minute longer, much less another year.
The troops did their best, served with honor, gallantry and great sacrifice. It was not they who failed, but it was our national leadership, two presidents, two administrations, many Congresses, and above all, our top military leadership. They have let the troops down once again just exactly as happened during the Vietnam War.
Let’s honor the troops and do right by them — and bring them all home now.
RALPH CHAPPELL
Winston-Salem

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Phargo's Pharm Pics and Recipes

Sunrise at the Farm

Bison Farm


Barnevelder Rooster

Cochins







Silkie

Studebaker




Winston-Salem Journal LTE TU 09/25/12


That’s enough
Frankly, I am mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it any more. No more telling me that I don't know enough to take care of myself! No more calling my retirement insurance (better known as Social Security) an entitlement, a handout, after my employers and I paid premiums for it for years! No more telling me that I consider myself a victim who expects the government to take care of me! I worked hard all my life, paid my taxes, saved some money and spent some on necessities that were made here in the United States. I donated to charities, supported my church and volunteered where I could be of help.
I voted in every election since I was 21; sometimes for Republicans, sometimes for Democrats, in a time when both could be relied upon to work together to achieve what was best for the country.
What I didn't do was hide my money in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland so I could avoid paying the taxes that build infrastructures that keep the country operating, as well as paying the police, firefighters, teachers, etc., who protect and educate us. I didn't buy up companies so I could close them down and send the work overseas. I didn't consider myself superior because of my hidden assets.
What I did for 79 years was consider myself, and act like, an American citizen. Which is more than can be said for Mitt Romney.
PATRICIA A. RECK
Winston-Salem
Works for the citizens
Over 50 percent of North Carolinians don’t know that state court judges are elected. I write to educate your readers regarding David Sipprell, an assistant district attorney in Forsyth County who is running for election to become a Forsyth County District Court Judge.
I have practiced law in Forsyth County state and federal courts for over 30 years. I know David and have worked with him. He is a well-educated, hardworking former Air Force officer and family man who works to protect the citizens of Forsyth County on a daily basis. He will make an excellent judge.
Please vote for David Sipprell on Nov. 6!
MICHAEL ROBINSON
Winston-Salem
Romney defended?
The front-page article “Romney remarks defended” (Sept. 19) turned our appreciated local newspaper into a cheap campaign circular in one fell swoop. Shame!
JAMES M. DUNN
Winston-Salem
Conservative policies
We should correlate take-home pay per personal cost of living as related to all other classes of take-home pay with the cost of living. Then, the usable difference in per-capita income and purchasing power emerges.
Ten percent of $100,000 to $1 million to $10 billion leaves $90,000, $900,000 and $9 billion of purchasing power. Even graduating the tax to 50 percent and 90 percent, the remaining $50,000, $500,000 and $5 billion still amounts to gross income and tax inequality.
The U.S.’s $14 trillion per annum economy is the richest in the world by far. Our personal debt of about 7 percent per person is among the average of nations. The right-wing’s effort to displace debt on the general population is treacherous. Our economy and wealth is not the problem; our failure to tax the overpaid and under-taxed upper classes fairly is the problem. Coupling this with overtaxing and underpaying the lower classes render economic inequality a major social problem. For we fail to provide all the people with the universal health care, education and supportive socio-physical infrastructure we should.
Conservatives’ social policies have only made the rich richer at the peoples’ and nation’s expense. Communism is not the answer. The mixed economy with its social diversity is.
MARCIALITO CAM
Winston-Salem

Monday, September 24, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE MO 09/24/12


Repairing the damage
Mitt Romney’s recently-disclosed comments are so crude, unfair and unpresidential that even long-time conservative supporters are criticizing him and abandoning his campaign.
Yet the Journal reports the problem on A8 (“Romney: Many think they are victims,” Sept. 18) and his apologists’ defenses on A1 (“Romney remarks defended,” Sept. 19).
Is this, perhaps, an indication of who the Journal will endorse for president this year?
If so, let me urge you strongly to reconsider. We had to suffer eight years of Republican tragedy under George W. Bush. No one could repair that damage in a mere four years, but President Obama has done a remarkable job, especially considering the opposition he’s faced from unreasonable, prejudiced men like Romney.
Bush led us to disaster. Obama pulled us back from the abyss. Does anyone really think that Romney would take us anywhere but back to disaster?
JANE FREEMONT GIBSON
Winston-Salem
Paying the debt
I hope most intelligent, reasoning people, whether Republican, Democrat or unaffiliated, read the Sept. 16 editorial “Business must cover this debt.” It's very well-written and to the point, which is:
Pat McCrory, a Republican running for governor of North Carolina, was and is a businessman. Business owners will benefit by taxing non-business owners, i.e., working stiffs like us, to pay back the loans from the federal government for unemployment compensation to workers laid off or fired during the recession. The reason for this was that our North Carolina legislature kept decreasing business owners' mandatory unemployment insurance payments for employees to keep and attract businesses, which has been happening since the 1990s. De-regulation of big business, which moved out of country; massive lay-offs; the unemployed filing in droves, and North Carolina reserves, underfunded because of the above, were quickly used up. Now we owe the federal government $2.8 billion in unemployment loans. $2.8 billion!
Pat McCrory wants all North Carolina taxpayers to foot this repayment by (gasp, of course!) raising non-business taxpayers’ taxes. Employees didn't benefit by these decreased unemployment premiums, just the business owners. As the editorial said, that's not fair. If Republican Pat McCrory becomes governor, with a majority Republican Senate and House, this is exactly what will happen.
Let business pay for this debt. Please remember this on voting day.
PATRICIA R. STOCKMEISTER
Winston-Salem
Refutation
The writer of the letter “Facts” (Sept. 18) seems to believe that labeling something as “fact” is an effective argument. Following is as much refutation as word limits allow:
The fact that job losses were occurring when President Obama was sworn in is typical for the middle of a recession. What is remarkable is how Obama’s counter-productive policies have retarded the recovery and have resulted in a 14.6 percent unemployment rate (inclusive of discouraged workers). Reagan’s recovery from a similar sharp downturn resulted in three times as much growth at the comparable business cycle point.
Crediting Obama with a rise in the stock market is extremely dubious. If Obama really does have magical market powers, why hasn’t he lifted the Dow above its 2007 level of 13,639? Has Obama fallen below the Bush benchmark? (Answer: no one has that kind of influence over the market.)
General Motors is not thriving. Its share price is half of what would be required to pay back the taxpayers. The Obama intervention merely allowed GM to continue its insane labor policies and compete unfairly with other auto companies that manufacture in the U.S. A proper bankruptcy procedure would have forced structural changes that would have allowed GM to thrive without additional subsidies.
Osama bin Laden is dead, thank God and thank the SEALs. And thank political adviser Valerie Jarrett who, having previously vetoed the mission three times, finally allowed Obama to give the go-ahead.
Fact is, we need new leadership.
ROBERT L. WATSON
Advance
When You Write
The Journal encourages readers’ comments. To participate in The Readers’ Forum, please submit letters to Letters@wsjournal.com. Please write “The Readers’ Forum” in the subject line and include your full name, address and a daytime telephone number. Or you may mail letters to: The Readers’ Forum, P.O. Box 3159, Winston-Salem, NC 27102. Letters are subject to editing and may be published on journalnow.com. Letters are limited to 250 words. Letter writers are allowed one letter every 30 days, but writers may respond to “Finish the Thought” and “Sum It Up” every week.
For more guidelines and advice on writing letters, go towww2.journalnow.com/news/opinion/letters_to_editor_guidelines/.
The Journal’s editorial board meets at 9:30 a.m. every Tuesday at our offices at 418 N. Marshall St. If you would like to sit in and observe an editorial board meeting, please send a request to the address above. By e-mail, please write “editorial board meeting” in the subject line. Include your name, address, daytime phone number and the date you would like to attend.

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE SU 09/23/12

The 47 percent
I find it hypocritical that a multimillionaire like Mitt Romney, who has spent his life looking for tax breaks from the government and hiding his money in the Cayman Islands and other tax shelters, should feel the need to tell 47 percent of us that we are a bunch of leeches.
Such a high number must include seniors; is he planning to get rid of Social Security as well as Medicare? I would remind him that Social Security is fully funded by payroll deductions and has never added one cent to the deficit. It is not an entitlement because we pay for it and own it — so politicians, hands off Social Security!
He and Sen. Paul Ryan plan to kill Medicare by making it Vouchercare. According to AARP, this will end Medicare. Currently my husband and I pay monthly premium dues from our Social Security checks. The Romney plan would be a crippling blow to many seniors; from what Romneys says, we'd be the people he doesn't have to think about. Is this the kind of president we want?
Finally, the reason Romney won't disclose his tax returns is because he doesn't want anyone to know just how many tax breaks he's had.
ELIZABETH L. SANER
Kernersville
Restricting religious expression
We Americans face a great decision this fall in our presidential election, not merely because of economic irresponsibility, but because we fail to honor God, causing serious immoral conduct: sexual atrocities, killings, dishonesty and intolerance. When citizens neglect their Creator, they not only become more interested in advancing themselves, but also disregard the foundation of human freedom stated in our Declaration of Independence: “all people are created equal.”
This is a religious affirmation. This truth is neglected by many political leaders as well as courts that prevent expressions of religion in governmental and public places, thereby promoting the establishment of secularism.
Our Bill of Rights provides freedom of religion for all people, not freedom from religion. Our Constitution emphasizes that expressions of religion are not to be restricted anywhere in our nation. Judgments or laws restricting the establishment of religion dare not limit expressing faith in God in public gatherings, lest they also restrict freedom of speech. Our Constitution prohibits acts establishing a religion, not expressions of religious faith. Individuals praying at governmental meetings, reading Bible verses or expressing faith in public is not the establishment of religion and this does not infringe others’ rights when done with equal consideration, which our forefathers understood.
We live in a world where Muslims enforce their religion and Communists excluded religion, but not in our nation if we elect leaders who abide by our Constitution. The freedom of religion for everyone is vital for a moral people and magnificent nation.
JIM HELVEY
Winston-Salem
Lift the regulations
I would like to point out the hypocrisy of the uber-rich, 1 percent Democrats like President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, the Hollywood elite, etc., in their “concern” and “love for the poor and downtrodden.” Utter rubbish! Where has been the left’s compassion when it comes to something that hits us all, but especially the poor: the cost of gas and electricity?
Under this administration, gas prices have doubled and electricity, at least for me, has risen at least 30 percent. The poor and middle class have been hit the hardest by these rising prices, yet these uber-rich Democrats are not affected and extremely out of touch with this simple reality.
Obama and his party have let the EPA run wild with regulations that affect our pockets. Face the facts; Obama wants high energy costs that hammer especially the poor. He and his rich buddies are not affected at all.
One should not care if the gas companies make billions in profit (which is what they are in business for) if gas reaches pre-Obama price levels. I guess the oil companies have Obama instead of George W. Bush in their back pocket now, yet no mention of that. We will see our income rise and have more disposable income when the chains of Democratic regulations are lifted off gas and electricity companies.
Vote for cheap gas and electricity in November and give yourself a raise.
EMMANUEL KAFANT
Winston-Salem

Sum It Up
Do you trust political polls?