Friday, September 9, 2011

Winston-Salem Journal LTE's FR 09/09/11

Good AM, folks!

We have a new topic in the LTE's today, thank goodness.

Not the moral way
Let's acknowledge this about the proposed marriage amendment: First, the Republican Party wants it on the 2012 ballot to distract from its refusal to cooperate with the president on any issue. This ploy brings out conservative voters and gives them a reason to vote their faith or their prejudice, while voting away their existing benefits.

Next, marriage between a man and women is a fine religious conviction and way of life. To make that the law of the land, however, inhibits others convictions and ways of life. Forcing one's beliefs on others is not the Christian or the moral way. No vote or legislation should exist that forces a religious belief on others.

MITCHELL BOSS
King

Vital matter
Massive demonstrations against the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline from Canada, through five U.S. states, have been taking place daily in Washington ("A climate test for Obama," Aug. 20). Hundreds are jailed every day.

Prominent scientists such as James Hanson and Bill McKibben, along with the Sierra Club, believe this pipeline would spell disaster for the planet. And yet there has been very little coverage of this matter in newspapers, magazines or TV. (There was a little buzz when Daryl Hannah was arrested, but mostly it has been ignored by the media.)

Many Internet websites have excellent coverage, but not the TV and print media. I am curious to know why the media ignore this vitally important matter. It's almost enough to turn one into a conspiracy theorist.

ANNE N. PAISLEY
Winston-Salem

Timetable
The Forsyth County commissioners foresee finishing the Kernersville library by the year 2020 ("Timetable to finish libraries advances," Sept. 2)? Have they not seen the "Going Out of Business" signs at Borders? By 2020 we'll be lucky if half the population even knows how to read. The other half will be doing so electronically. Better to update the existing centrally located downtown library and put the rest of the money into schooling with attached libraries accessible to the public.

BRENDA HUTCHINS
Winston-Salem

Crime lab is fair
As a former judge and as acting crime lab director, I respectfully disagree with the Aug. 29 guest column by Mark Rabil, "Bring science and fairness to the SBI crime lab."

Rabil buries the critical fact that the crime lab scientist, talking willingly and freely with the defendant's attorney in the discovery process, volunteered that there had been a reporting language change. Had she not done so, the change likely would never have been identified, and the defendant's case may well have suffered.

Science is not static, particularly in the rapidly developing DNA discipline. DNA expert John M. Butler writes that "as experience using various analytical procedures grows, interpretation guidelines may evolve and improve." That is what happened here, and it was the lab scientist who correctly and properly made counsel and the court aware of it.

After the disclosure, it appears the judge and the parties essentially agreed to a court order directing preparation of a report reflecting the analyst's actual expected testimony — not, as Rabil submits, a judge "hav[ing] to order a scientist to prepare an accurate report."

I am proud of this lab scientist, who spoke the truth and reported the latest science. In nearly 43,000 cases annually, state crime laboratory scientists remain absolutely committed to the highest ethical and scientific standards and, yes, to fundamental fairness.

JOSEPH R. JOHN SR.
ACTING DIRECTOR
N.C. STATE CRIME LABORATORY
Raleigh

Sum It Up:
The Sum It Up question from Sunday was: Do you feel safer now than in the days right after Sept. 11, 2001?


* * * * *

No, we are absolutely not safe from another 9/11. Muslim radicals have tried to strike again several times, and only by luck and enhanced interrogation of prisoners have we been able to stop another deadly attack. President Obama's policy of military downsizing and sucking up to our Middle-Eastern enemies has simply whetted their appetite for more of our blood. It's only a matter of time until they successfully attack us again with even more horrendous results.

LINDA DIORIO


* * * * *

I feel safer because I have given up flying.
TSA = Too Scary Authority.

CLAYTON MOORE


* * * * *

No. I don't feel safer because the cause for 9/11 still remains. The cause is our continued occupation of the Middle East. Ten years later and most Americans still don't get it.

KAM BENFIELD


* * * * *

Do I feel safer now than right after 9/11?
Not really; because we have met the enemy and he is us (with apologies to Pogo).

LOUIS NEWTON

41 comments:

  1. LTE1: I agree. Refer to Alfred P. Doolittle's comments on "middle class morality."

    LTE2: This proposed pipeline threatens the nation and all of Creation? I believe similar was said about the Alaska pipeline, and has been completely wrong. This LTE writer should go back to her batik and macrame, and leave energy policy to someone else.

    LTE3: We voted for a new library. Get on with it.

    LTE4: I plead ignorance re this issue.

    Sum It Up: I feel no more or less safe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lte1...it all depends, in the end, who is doing the forcing and what is being forced. The ranking on the PC scale determines.

    LTE2...maybe people are worn out listening to doomsday hysteria from these "environmentalists". The people and group you mention would be protesting if I cut my grass too short. According to some in the movement, we are supposed to be dead now. The environment is too important to be left in the hands of environmentalists.

    Lte3..library again?

    Lte4..crime lab? I know nothing about one as I have never committed a crime....in the USA.

    Safer now? I feel the same as before 911. Mercifully, I don't fly anymore as I used to have to do to the point of soul numbing boredom.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mark Rabil was a second rate lawyer years ago when Hunt was convicted, and he's a second rate lawyer now. If it weren't for Hunt, Rabil's name would hardly be known today.

    Rabil is a typical liberal, he thinks that whatever he says, the public is going to be gullible enough to believe.

    As far as I'm concerned, Hunt may still be guilty based on the evidence I've heard. Mainly, because two people were involved according to one witness, and given the size of Sykes.

    The lack of a defendant's DNA at a crime scene, does not intrinsically make the defendant not guilty of the crime charged.

    I'm sure we'll hear from our own resident wanna be lawyer 'Kitty Kat' on this one. He's got the aptitude of Rabil, so his babble should be interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. OT: I received an email from this site reporting that you had posted here, but you are absent. Did you remove the post?

    ReplyDelete
  5. LTE #4 - Mr. John is less than forthcoming. We have endured years of phony lab reports from the SBI. No one knows how many people are sitting in prison because of falsified SBI lab reports. He tells us that his lab scientist was "forthcoming" in discovery that the rules had changed.

    Well, if the rules have changed, we should not have to wait for discovery to find out. That should be announced publicly, well in advance from the time that they are changed, so that everyone, prosecutors and defenders, will know what the rules are.

    Maybe we need a new "acting director" of the SBI crime lab.

    Sum It Up - Anyone who feels safer today than they were in 2001 is simply a sucker. For 10 years, the major effort has been directed at airport security. As one who reads copiously real intelligence reports from around the world, I can assure you that the next major terrorist attack will not have anything to do with airports. And it will be much worse than 9/11.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Stab...with Kitty Kat's mental state being what it is...you could get knock on the door at any time from any number of governmental agencies.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I hope it stays that way.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I believe this site and OT's comments are protected by the 1st Amendment, as are yours, so I fear no helicopters or knocks on my door, except for pesky guy hustling AT&T Uverse.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "As one who reads copiously real intelligence reports from around the world, I can assure you that the next major terrorist attack will not have anything to do with airports." -Kitty Kat

    What an idiotic statement. Kitty Kat implies that he/she/it has access to all top secret intelligence reports from around the world.

    It just never stops.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I hope he doesn't 'actually' practice law. If he does, I'll bet he gets spanked daily.......

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bucky, you are dumber than a rock.

    1. I am not Kit. i wish Kit would post here if for no other reason than to say every few minutes how truly dumb you are.

    2. I read military journals that you have never heard of and subscribe to a number of online intelligence sites that you will never see. I note that you posted something the other day about a small aircraft warning. Well, that makes you just as dumb as whoever issued that warning.

    3. I am not a lawyer.

    I repeat, you are dumber than a rock.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Buckmeister.. I know Mark Rabil and have worked with him both in a firm and collaborating on cases. You are not qualified to make that comment. You allow your prejudice and bigotry to taint your judgment. You flail about to find a way to validate your prejudice in this instance and all you can come up with is a critism of Rabil. Why?...because he he tirelessy and at great sacrifice at the time devoted himself to representing Darryl Hunt? And eventually, despite the resistance of the police and the court system, succeeded? He is an excellent attorney as evidenced by that one case. In fact, that is what attorneys should be doing rather than simply chasing a buck (no pun intended :). He's the type of attorney that would fight for your sorry *ss if you were ever up against the system. So, please, restrict your comments to something you know something about.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Good AM, AJV!

    No, let Bucky comment about things he knows not. We have heard enough over the last year about what he knows.

    ReplyDelete
  14. O.T.---rocks world wide are relieved?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I admire and respect Rabil, but Freedman seems to be the go-to guy if you're in really deep.

    ReplyDelete
  16. That's because Rabil is head of a department that assists other attorneys with difficult capital cases. He's not on the private market. I am not familiar with Freedman's record, but if Rabil were on the private market, he'd be the go-to guy since he has won a big time case.

    ReplyDelete
  17. If you're being sued, Jim Cooney (Charlotte) is about as good as they come. If you are having a tiff with the criminal justice system, Wade Smith (Raleigh) is very well regarded.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Stab, There are many other excellent lawyers in each of those fields that don't get any publicity. Publicity does not equate to results. There's a saying in the legal field that there is no such thing as bad publicity. We are a TV generation and gravitate towards the face or name we see on TV or in the press no matter the qualifications or the record.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Staballoy, et al:
    Today, two days before the tenth aniversary of one of the worst days in American history, I am compelled to finally sit down and mourn the day of 09/11/2001. It was a day like any other day and like many Americans, I was at work. I left my desk for a short coffee break and as I made my way back to my desk there was an abnormal buzz through the maze of cubicles and phone banks. As I sat back at my desk I was told of the attack on the Pentagon and one of the towers in NY. I don't know why but at that moment I looked at my wrist watch and pulled out the little knob at 8:52 AM. That wrist watch is still in the drawer in my night stand, stopped at the very moment the heart and soul of America was attached.

    I KNEW at that very moment that the attacks had to be the work of Osama Bin Laden. Just a week or two before, I had heard him on the evening news as having said that "America will get theirs".

    My job depended on incoming and outgoing calls, but we had been asked to limit communications by phone so we were sent home after about an hour. I live in northeastern Winston Salem. As I got to Liberty St. driving by Smith Reynolds Airport it was an eerie drive home. No planes were moving in or out of the airport. I got home, numb for the rest of the day. Numb for the rest of the week. I ached to hug my daughter and yet unborn grandchild, but I couldn't. They weren't here, and I didn't know where they were. We had had a falling out and she moved somewhere and I didn't know where. I knew they were o.k., but I still needed to hug them. For what seems forever, I would stay glued to the TV for the next few days getting updates on the victims in the towers, the Pentagon and the one that crashed in the field, missing it's intended target. I watched the same scenes, over and over and over again. After a few days, Americans did not lose hope but began to mourn the loss of what we had.

    But I couln't cry, I still don't know why. As I am writing this, almost ten years later, I am sobbing.

    Ask anyone where they were, what they were doing ten years ago on 09/11/2001. If you are old enough to remember, post it here, let us know.

    ReplyDelete
  20. No argument from me, AJV...I'm not hooked into the WS legal scene anymore. I knew Rabil worked for the capital defender's office, but I didn't know if that was still the case. I heard him speak on the Hunt case when I was a 3L at WFU; it was a great talk. And I was struck by how soft-spoken Hunt was.

    Freedman got that dentist off who killed his wife with a spear (Turner, I think his name was), and it seems like whenever a teacher gets caught schtupping one of their students, or when there's a high profile murder case, he's the guy on defense.

    ReplyDelete
  21. AJV, comment well taken. I'm probably a bit biased, having met Cooney and seen him in action (I worked for Womble at one time); and have read about and met Smith.

    We don't gravitate toward all, perhaps. I recall an L.A. radio host commenting re Leslie Abramson, who defended the Menendez brothers: "The only way you'd root for her would be if you were wearing an orange jumpsuit, and standing beside her in a courtroom."

    ReplyDelete
  22. Vince and Mark are both great guys. I went to Jr and Sr High school with them. Vince was Student Body President as I recall.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hi LaSombra, and thank you.

    I am starting a new page for 09/11, will paste your poignant comment there, and invite others, as you did, to post theirs.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Kitty Kat....if you're reading classified military journals and posting ANY of that information on line, you have a high probability of going to jail, pencilhead.

    Given your level of intellect and mental psychosis, you've probably already been in jail more than once, so I guess you know what to expect.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Oh, I agree....Vince and Mark are great guys, but they are mediocre lawyers, at best.

    Why do you think Hunt ended up in the slammer for so many years, if he was innocent?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Stab......Cooney is an excellent lawyer. You get the gold star for the day for that comment. I was getting worried about you.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Arthur....you're slipping on me, and I had such high hopes for you. You might want to research who Turner's lawyer(s) were.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bob.....by the way....don't think your comment about jail being a cure for heterosexuality flew over my head, you naughty boy.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I agree with AJV that there are many excellent unknown lawyers. Back when I was doing a lot of juvenile justice volunteering, I got to see a wide variety of lawyers operate. One in particular, whose name i do not remember, a very young woman, was defending a case in District Court which may have had something to do with trespassing...at any rate her defense was based upon where a property line was in relation to the defendant. It was a pretty trivial case but she had done her homework very thoroughly, had a property map and photos. She backed the arresting officer into a corner and forced him to admit that he had no idea where the defendant was standing when he arrested him and the judge threw the case out. I was quite impressed...wouldn't hesitate to have her rep for me.

    Both Rabils are excellent lawyers, among the best around. Mark initially lost the Hunt case because of police incompetence, prosecutorial malfeasance, and a generally screwed up process. Anyone who still thinks that Hunt was involved is lost in space.

    But the lawyer that I wouldn't want to tangle with is Vic Lefkowitz, a sweet guy until he walks into the courtroom.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Any lawyer can get an innocent person off (unless his name is Rabil), it takes a true lawyer to get the guilty off. -Bucky 9/9/2011

    ReplyDelete
  31. Good afternoon folks!
    LTE 1: A resident from King sent this in? Perhaps it's not the theocracy I thought it to be. Marriage does have a legal / religious duality aspect. Individual ministers and churches will always have the say in whom may be married in their church, but I still fail to see any secular reason for prohibiting civil ceremonies for same-sex couples.
    LTE 2: The media has been rather preoccupied with the economy, the weather, and the Congressional kindergarten ("my way or I'll take my toys and go home!").
    LTE 3: Libraries are about far more than just books. Judging from the comments on the Journal site, I'd say there's no danger in the literacy rate dropping, but the reading comprehension level leaves a LOT to be desired.
    LTE 4: Not surprised to see a defense of the crime lab from its director. 43k cases a year means 43k people a year having their futures depending on the objective and accurate results of the lab tests. How can someone get a fair trial if the lab results can't be trusted?
    Sum it up: I rather like Mr. Newton's response. Do we have more to fear from an organized terrorist group or from individual nutcases with easy access to assault weapons and many rounds of ammo?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Well whaddya know, I could've sworn it was Freedman. I get things wrong sometimes...such is life.

    Good thing for me that your approval is not high on my list of priorities, Bucky. If you're interested in this kind of thing, go to law school and become a DA. You probably won't reach any respectable career goals if you spend all your days as a professional troll. I can't imagine it's good for interpersonal relationships either.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I didn't realize I would start a free referral service for lawyers. Of course you realize I am hamstrung as far as commenting on any of the named individuals. And Bucky, you've really got a h@rd-on about the Rabils don't you? Did one of them beat you up in court? I know Vince was a prosecutor.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yeah, Vince got Buckwheat convicted of felony dumbness...six months on the chain gang.

    Hoo...hah...hoo...hah!
    That's the sound of the bucks, workin' on the chain gang...

    ReplyDelete
  35. Speaking of Vince, he apparently mishandled a murder case several years ago, and the WS Journal wrote an article about it. Poor ole Mark, mistakenly, got 'his' picture on the front page of the Journal, saying it was him.

    I don't dislike the Rabils, they are nice enough from what I know. They're just not good lawyers based on their track records, let's face it.

    They're always good for a good chuckle though. Just like Kitty Kat.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Kitty Kat....Vietnam Combat Veteran, PhD in Psychiatry, and ACLU lawyer. Hee Hee...you gotta love it.

    ReplyDelete
  37. MIAMI — Shawn Loftis, a substitute teacher in the Miami-Dade County Public School system was fired after his middle school principal found out about his porn career through a Wikipedia entry under his porn name, Collin O’Neal.

    Lofits, also a citizen reporter for CNN, was suspended and then had his teacher’s license revoked. After unsuccessfully suing to get back in the classroom, Loftis returned to making gay pornography.

    _______________

    Why did I know that CNN would somehow be involved?

    ReplyDelete
  38. "Pass it right away!" ---President Obama

    We're now learning that the bill hasn't even been written yet. How can congress pass it, right away?

    Hee Hee.....you gotta love it.

    ReplyDelete
  39. You get an MD in psychiatry, a PhD in psychology. A psychiatrist is a medical doctor and can prescribe drugs, a psychologist cannot.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Kitty Kat...you pencil head, when asked in what subject you got your PhD in by Stab, you said experimental or some such nonsense-psychiatry.

    I don't make this stuff up. You should make a copy of the stuff you type into this forum late at night. That way, when you wake up from the drug/alcohol induced hang-over, you'll remember.

    ReplyDelete