Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Winston-Salem Journal LTE TU 01/10/12


Insightful picture
I read the Jan. 3 letter "Intelligent columnists" with great interest and alarm. Like Naomi Davis, I do not want the Journal to drop Thomas Friedman, David Brooks or Paul Krugman columns from the paper. Those three gentlemen give us an insightful picture of what is happening in the world and our country.
As a majority reader of one, I am requesting that this particular trio stay in the paper along with Cal Thomas, George Will and John Hood — please .

DAN STRAKA
Advance
Informed opinions
"Say it isn't so." Tell me you're not going to discontinue the columns of my favorite columnists, Thomas Friedman and Paul Krugman. The policy of the U.S. government affects our daily lives, yet you could deprive us of these writers' erudite and informed opinions?
You devote an entire section of your newspaper to sports every day, plus often an extra section. Where are your values?
This country's welfare and a well-informed public are more important than sports.

MILDRED H. MEYER
Kernersville
Makes sense
Please, please do not remove Thomas Friedman's column from the Journal! He makes more sense than all the other columnists combined. He would be a good candidate for president.
If you want to save money, who don't you delete Lio and some other equally stupid comic strips?

EVALYN CUNINGHAM
Winston-Salem
Calendar change
Companies and organizations keep asking me to save paper and expenses by paying my bills online. I don't have and can't afford a computer, so I suggest, to save paper and operate more efficiently, we should change our year to 13 months of four weeks per month. Every month would be 28 days. That means our calendars would last forever.
We wouldn't need to get new calendars every year and each holiday would be on the same day of the month every year.
Who was it who made some months 28 days, some 30 and some 31? And why are we so stupid as to accept this incongruity?
Wake up! Start thinking, do something right for once. Let everyone have a vacation on the 165th day of the year.

GORDON MELLISH
Clemmons

39 comments:

  1. It's the same old tired liberal rhetoric, by the same old LTE writers: The conservative columnists are a bunch of dummies, and the liberal ones are smart.

    I want diversity. I don't want all liberal propagandists, and I don't want all conservatives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bobby...Bobby...Bobby...where are you at? How have you been feeling?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "If you want to save money, who don't you delete Lio and some other equally stupid comic strips?"

    EVALYN CUNINGHAM
    Winston-Salem

    Even liberals realize that the Journal is going under.

    ReplyDelete
  4. NC Man Charged With Having Sex With Dog
    ___________

    I don't know what all the fuss is about. This is perfectly normal in this day and age.
    http://www.wxii12.com/news/30167197/detail.html#ixzz1j4pu5rHf

    ReplyDelete
  5. :)I'm doing well, thanks, Bucky.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm fully re-hydrated now. I was in hypovolemic shock caused by severe dehydration resulting from a combination of factors.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow! I've heard of that. People don't even realize it's happening until it knocks them in the dirt.

    Glad you're back, go to go, hopefully.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good afternoon folks!
    LTE 1-3: I'm in agreement that these columnists should not be dropped. While there are more columnists out there who speak from the left, these are the most thoughtful. The idea of dropping the sports section or cartoons is rather silly, especially the call to drop Lio. Lio rocks!
    LTE 4: "Who was it who made some months 28 days, some 30 and some 31?" - That would be Julius Caesar who created the Julian calendar around 45 BC which was the standard until the Gregorian calendar which is used today came about in the 16th century under the direction of Pope Gregory XIII to correct errors in the Julian which by that time was off by 10 days. Changing the calendar ain't gonna happen. A year is 365.25 days which isn't neatly divisible by 12 or 13, so we're stuck with what we got. Btw...you can use a computer for free at your local library.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bucky re man and dog: that happens often after closing time at meat market bars. "They all get prettier at closing time." Beer goggles, y'know.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Stab....amen to that one.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm not much of a Ron Paul fan, however, he did say something that makes sense. He said he thought gay people should have to pay higher health insurance rates. You would think that would make particular sense if they are going to charge more to people that smoke. Risky behavior is risky behavior.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "The mixed breed female dog was taken to a veterinarian who recovered a DNA sample."

    Crime against nature? Pooohey! That was rape!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thank Goodness the old hag with a magnifying glass hasn't appeared today.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wonder where Whitewall is? He's always a pisser.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Looking atcha, Schmuck. As a matter of fact, been looking for other great pics with that great magnifying glass. Can't wait to change my profile pic; the current one looks like it ran 5 miles.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "This country's welfare and a well-informed public are more important than sports."

    Ms. Meyer...what kind of an American are you?

    In all seriousness, I like Krugman a heckuva lot better than Friedman. Friedman's thoughts can be pretty muddled. PK is much more clear and incisive, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I figured you couldn't resist making a bigger fool out of yourself by showing up. I like 'hag'. It's perfect for you, you miserable human.

    Made anymore influential presentations lately? Hee Hee...you gotta love it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Like I said yesterday, YOU'RE one who keeps brining it up.

    Definition of Schmuck: Yiddish shmok, literally, penis.

    Synonyms: bastard, beast, boor, dirtbag, dog, fink, heel, hound, jerk, louse, lout, rat, scum, scumbag, scuzz, scuzzball, skunk, sleaze, sleazebag, sleazeball, slob, snake, swine, toak, vermin . . .

    ReplyDelete
  19. Couln't go ONE DAY without thinking about me, could you?

    ReplyDelete
  20. I like having you around, you old hag. You're a perfect example of how liberals like to make fools of themselves....Hee Hee.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Rielle/Nancy/Hag....I'm not Tim, you fool.

    And, you're the hater Rielle, along with your little liberal buddy, Rush. You're the one that doesn't like me telling the truth about liberals, gays, and Democratic political figures. Why else would you want to identify me? What would be your motivation other than to try to silence me?

    I think 'hag' fits you the best. I may drop Rielle in case you were wondering.

    ReplyDelete
  22. My name is not LaSombra, Rielle, Nancy Drew, hag . . .

    ReplyDelete
  23. I never insisted that they were your real names. I'll give you a little hint. Bucky isn't my name either.

    It just NEVER stops.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'll bet it's not smart ass, either. You're anything BUT smart.

    ReplyDelete
  25. . . . but you CAN run 5 miles!!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yep...Motor Mouth. Grew up with a kid who woke up blabbing in the morning and was still going when he fell asleep at night. We called him Motor Mouth.

    And just like Knothead, everything he said was meaningless BS!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Months ago I promised that the Republican candidates would provide never ending entertainment.

    Ricky boy now wants to send the troops back to Iraq. Wouldn't you love to see him debate Knothead? Talk about low comedy.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bucky, Whitewall has tired of the site's changed character, has asked to have his icon deleted. I also am saddened at the divergence from commentary re news, opinion, science, local issues, local history, and more. I have intended to try to Involve myself more in the site, but work, family, and now another cat trying fight his way to recovery deflect me.

    Bob continues to maintain the site, so perhaps we can revitalize it.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I agree with WW's opinion and declare myself guilty of being one of those who has allowed Knothead to highjack the site for his own nefarious purposes by repeatedly responding to his ridiculous stuff, while failing to respond to the LTEs and other more important comments.

    I have little to say about todays LTEs, but promise to pay more attention to them and less to nonsense. An excellent example of neglect is the LTE last week about the library...you could not buy such high quality advertising, yet I think only one person even mentioned it.

    Dotnet has been the stalwart, sticking to the topic day after day. Thank you, Dotnet.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I offer no excuse for my behavior, just an explanation. It is not only disrespectful but HURTFUL to be referred to as a hag and as a miserable human, among other vile and horrific names.

    Despite the hurtful exchanges, I CHOOSE to come back for the diversity, openness, and social aspects of the commentary here.

    One of the many values I was taught as a child was respect for others. This would include speaking of and referring to someone as Mr. or Miss So-and-So, NEVER anything other than their chosen or given name. I also learned to respect diversity of all forms.

    One last thing I learned late in life, and from experience, is if I feel that I am being put down so that someone else can feel important I will defend myself. This I will continue to do.


    Stab: my sincere apologies for perpetuating this behavior. I will C&P this same comment in an e-mail message to you so that we can continue to discuss this behavior. It has become necessary to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Hey, LaSombra, I was in no way being critical of you. I understand everything that you have said most clearly.

    I was simply recognizing that the despicable Bucky has caused us all to deviate from the original plan, much because he is a disgusting person, and, at the same time, such an easy target... thus an irresistible one. I simply ignore his insults because I realize that he is seriously psychologically and socially defective.

    BTW, love your new avatar. A great improvement. Please continue.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Rush: I went back to re-read my rant and realize that it sounds as if I was ragging on you. I wasn't, and I apologize. We (I) can choose not to allow the Schmuck to get under our (my) skin, but short of boycotting the forum it's difficult to ignore it when we are BOMBARDED at every turn with so much energy draining negativity.

    Oh, and thanks for the compliment. I've been told I look like Eva Méndez.

    ReplyDelete
  33. "...energy draining negativity"

    An excellent characterization. I will try my best not to be sucked into that black hole again.

    As to Eva Méndez...hmmm...I may be old, but I am not dead. Having spent a great deal of time in Mexico, Central America, Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, Chile, Uruguay and Argentina, I have developed a great appreciation for smart, sassy Latinas.

    Maybe we should have a cup of coffee sometime. I am a great story teller, or so some say.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I've made that decision, not to get sucked into that black hole. But it's still hurtful . . .

    . . .and as you've mentioned, Slopbucket IS an easy target. THIS is what I am most guilty of.

    FYI: my husband also has a great appreciation for smart, sassy and SHORT Latinas. I'm a sucker for charmers, though.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Oops...husbands can be dangerous people...and who could blame them. Yours sounds like a very smart man.

    I am a lifelong basketball player...high school, college, military...played on several championship teams...and still play several times a week...well over six feet, so always gravitated to tall women.

    But my latest girlfriend was barely five feet tall and under 100 pounds...a gymnast, dancer artist and all round brilliant woman. Unfortunately, she had her own issues which did not quite coincide with mine, so now we are just friends.

    But I have a newfound appreciation for SHORT women. My compliments to your husband.

    As to Slopbucket, it is shameful that we are attracted to easy targets, when we should be aspiring to the hard ones. In times like these, it is only those who will take on the hard problems who have a hope of getting us out of the mess. Let's try.

    ReplyDelete